This didn’t take long…
http://forums.quattroworld.com/rs4b7/msgs/96773.phtml
I’m really not even sure what fucking info he is looking for?? He thinks a 2.5"full system for $2000 will net him only 10 less whp than the full JHM 2.75" system for $3200…and it’s actually $2750 if you jump on the bad ass deal they have going right now!
Gibson said he understands about area under the curve…blah blah blah, but is so fucking hung up on peak numbers on the dyno!!
Some peoples kids…
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/92800314/Screen%20Shot%202013-03-21%20at%205.14.58%20PM.png
read the first QF response…rocket scientists over there!
[size=8pt][quote]my gains with 2.5…
high flow cats) added 17 whp / 16 tq
APR tune 13whp / 16 tq
between both downpipes and APR tune i got 30whp and 32lbs tq. i would say slightly more than that after the ECU had time to adjust, i just never went back to the dyno but, i would just say gains are probably closer to 35-40whp after adaption. i would guess catback would add another 2-5whp to the numbers above.
for 2.75, if i had to guess i’d say 6-8whp more and at the expense of less bottom end torque? i remember reading that removing the precats will slightly lower bottom torque but increase top end… i would assume bigger diameter exhaust will do the same. maybe if you have plans to supercharge later on then 2.75 might make more sense.
[/quote]
Does anyone remember Justincredible running just headers on the dragstrip and blowing his tires off the line…so much for the back pressure no low end torque argument. I know it’s a different beast, but an example of myths.