^ Holy Shit! My new retirement plan.
Haha great movie
car goes on fire = comprehensive insurance = no rate hike or deductible
car goes off road because moron = collision insurance = rate hike + deductible owing
(not to mention careless/reckless driving charges which will also jack up his rates and see him in court)

Now there’s another story to that:
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/05/16/22543f31e6a0aff439200ccfe1a274c4.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Far more plausible. If your brakes went on fire while driving you’d have already backed off from fade. Further you wouldn’t be parked on a 70 degree angle on an embankment… You’d be at the side of the road where your car would be engulfed and consumed. There’s absolutely zero sign of a fire happening on the actual road. The road would be black and covered in melted plastic if the fire happened where they parked it, and then the car ended up down the embankment.
The brake fire story is so the guy can defraud his insurer.
What model S4 is that?

Wow, that’s a new one lol. That second video is great.

Far more plausible. If your brakes went on fire while driving you’d have already backed off from fade. Further you wouldn’t be parked on a 70 degree angle on an embankment… You’d be at the side of the road where your car would be engulfed and consumed. There’s absolutely zero sign of a fire happening on the actual road. The road would be black and covered in melted plastic if the fire happened where they parked it, and then the car ended up down the embankment.
The brake fire story is so the guy can defraud his insurer.
What model S4 is that?
What would the difference be as far as defrauding the insurer. I would think both cases insurance would cover the car.
A) you went off the road slightly and crashed - Your fault
B) car mysteriously had the brakes catch on fire, most likely because of EXTREME conditions - questionable if driver actions were at fault of freak of nature.
So I guess just the difference lies with “at fault” or not.

sakimano:
Far more plausible. If your brakes went on fire while driving you’d have already backed off from fade. Further you wouldn’t be parked on a 70 degree angle on an embankment… You’d be at the side of the road where your car would be engulfed and consumed. There’s absolutely zero sign of a fire happening on the actual road. The road would be black and covered in melted plastic if the fire happened where they parked it, and then the car ended up down the embankment.
The brake fire story is so the guy can defraud his insurer.
What model S4 is that?
What would the difference be as far as defrauding the insurer. I would think both cases insurance would cover the car.
A) you went off the road slightly and crashed - Your fault
B) car mysteriously had the brakes catch on fire, most likely because of EXTREME conditions - questionable if driver actions were at fault of freak of nature.So I guess just the difference lies with “at fault” or not.
car goes on fire = comprehensive insurance = no rate hike or deductible
car goes off road because moron = collision insurance = rate hike + deductible owing
(not to mention careless/reckless driving charges which will also jack up his rates and see him in court)
^
I guess that guy doesnt want to marry her lol.
Haha ya that’s pretty awesome.
First S3 sighting. Sharp looking car.
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/05/22/d19a4ce50571b34aced27de8e2e199a9.jpg
^
I guess that guy doesnt want to marry her lol.
Haha ya that’s pretty awesome.
Oh wow that’s the first black one I’ve seen. Looks much classier than the blue one I’ve seen around town
the sunroof retraction thing is a little odd. Other than that, I thought it looked nice.

the sunroof retraction thing is a little odd. Other than that, I thought it looked nice.
More headroom, I guess?
Is it like the S5 where it can’t go into the roof so it just pops up ?
On the s5 it’s because the roof is too short front to back.
^^ ya it retracts externally. Not a huge fan of that.