too bad you didn’t get any better runs on 100 . The car has 11.0 in it. And maybe a bit more MPH. WAs it later in the day, and getting a bit warmer/worse DA?
Available now. You can do the install on your own, but we would obviously prefer a dealer to do it.
I think they were similar, but probably less in the evening. Tack temps were dropping though and our 60 ft on the best 100 octane run wasn’t as good as 93. I believe our biggest problem was the clutch. Lots of slip down the track would ruin half the runs we did. It was a clutch masters (wasn’t our first choice) and it died on me a day or so later. We were there with something like 5-7 cars too so there were a lot of different cars running for different reasons. Basically, we didn’t stay the whole day focused on just the S5.
comparing it to the 1320hp numbers on the old kit…
old kit = 537 hp 11.9
new kit = 589hp 11.1
that’s what i was comparing it to; seems to be many more factors than just raw power which are enabling those crazy times!
crank numbers mean jack shit from Apr since they have hub dyno.
Arin puts crank numbers for markets where they care about crank but to get to them he just applies stock drivetrain loss % to the modified hub numbers. If the car was weak stock or had a problem that had it down on power…or just made less than audi claimed, it exacerbates the supposed drive train loss which is applied to the worked over modified car and makes it look crazy. He doesn’t have a choice, so im not knocking it, but he hasn’t actually measured crank hp. The two stock baselines may have been different and had different applied oercentage drivetrain losses. Another reaon not to put much stock in dyno numbers.
Compare the wheel (hub) number of each.
In fact fuck it…compare the 124-125 mph trap speed to the 115-116 of the 1320 kit. That’s 80-100 whp. That’s 100 crank comfortably. More likely its more.