What about me? Seeing as the APR CPS has not been confirmed to fit my car. If I went a custom “cps” route would I still be looking at the same kind of install times as the b8 guys?
The more I look at the apr supercharger the more it reminds me of a 6 peg Lego brick and with such a quick install time even more like a Lego brick lol
I’m going to keep that one close to my chest for the moment, but I will post a smiley face. ; )
I don’t’ know what that means.
[/quote]
Pressure ratio, see the compressor map (or show it lol)
Edit: they beat me to it…yeah the compressor maps usually only show to 2.4 PR from Eaton for the TVS, hopefully we can do a little better if we’re going to force feed this bitch some air
Audi are going to turbos for the S cars. But the supercharged V6 seems to be making it’s way into the mass produced lines like the Q5, Q7, A6. Maybe this new one will make it’s way into those cars for speed/efficiency bumps. Having said that, I can’t see a big market for a Q7 with more than the current 333hp.
really? That sounds like a misinterpretation of the development process maybe? They looked at every possible power plant option and came back to what worked best… V8 all motor.
hahaha I doubt it. That’s far too expensive. The Bavarians do it the hardest way possible… Small v8 and a million revs. The Americans take the simpler approach… Leaves tons of headroom too.
I reckon we will find out next year. Such a long process for the big guys.
A few things I think people would love to hear from you. The tvs 1900series has a HUGE load draw almost 45hp companys like pes and amd think bolting on a huge blower is the answer when in fact the 1900 or the whipple 2.4 has HUGE load draw loss. Csn you talk more on cfm per unit compaired to those units as im sure we can expext bad informaion comming from those two companys to try and shoot this impressive apr advancemnt down