I’m going to keep that one close to my chest for the moment, but I will post a smiley face. ; )
Edit: will it be able to go to 2.4 PR or so?
I don’t’ know what that means.
[/quote]
Engine speed and pulley size alone doesn’t really matter. What matters is the relationship between the two as this will determine how fast the supercharger spins at any given RPM. I’m not sure why you would want to run up to 8500 RPM anyways. DI platforms become increasingly limited at higher RPMs as the window to inject fuel becomes increasingly smaller. I would chose a lower RPM, smaller pulley, and more torque across the power band.
Just a couple more thoughts, and a repost of the “weight” question…don’t want to let that one go…
The answer about the TB…lol…I’m willing to bet it’s going up to 90mm, with a separate transition for the stock TB, and a later option of a APR 90mm TB. I just can’t see you guys getting a casting made with a 70mm TB that will have to possibly support 500 whp.
And you know I was fishing about injectors in the other thread. Like I said, with stage II, at 6-7 ms injection duration in the midrange is a LOT, I guess it’s only high 5s ms at 7000 rpm. But still, at 7000 rpm one revolution is 8.5 ms. I also remember you saying there’s no room for E85 (which can use 30-50%+ more fuel), so I’d imagine there’s a bit of an injector headroom issue for stage III. Curious if it’s going to be a HPFP solution, or a new injector solution. I know, I know, you can’t say, but hints are fun…