AWD LSDs. Like trying to understand string theroy...

Awd LSDs are difficult to understand due to the interactions between the front, center and read diffs. I comprehend the reasons behind the RWD and FWD but AWD remains elusive. Many RS4s have installed a rear LSD and have been very happy. To me that’s odd because I would think that a front LSD would be more beneficial since it always seems that in my driving the fronts slip first. Then there is the 60:40 split on the center diff further complicating things. I found this link that explains the issue based on DSMs http://farnorthracing.com/autocross/diffs.html so it should be applicable. JHM makes a rear LSD and most people have installed the rear one. This link on Audizine http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/535684-My-(also)-Ibis-RS4-Build-Thread talks about road racing a clutch based rear LSD. Maybe you guys can shed some light on the mythical LSD for the RS4 AWD car?

From that article I think that 1.5 way http://www.osgiken.net/products.php?product=lsd is the one that you want but what makes the most difference front, rear or all? I’m assuming that the front would help with the understeer. Thoughts?

I would think a center LSD could benefit the car the same way a JHM 4:1 does, it takes away some control from the front tires that are causing the understeer in the first place.

The rear LSD helps because it takes power from the inner tire and sends it to the outer tire to push the car around a corner.

I guess with both you could send a lot of power to the rear outer tire which could push the car around the corner.

I read the article about the DSM. Certain things stood out to me.

[quote=“DSM article”]For example, to reduce understeer on a FWD car on corner exit, one approach is to increase the amount of rear weight transfer distribution by softening the front bar, stiffening the rear bar, or both. One would expect this to increase the amount of load on the outside rear tire (at the expense of the load on the inside rear tire) and thus reducing the amount of grip on the rear of the car, promoting oversteer. Often overlooked is that the increased outside rear load will increase the load on the opposite diagonal (on the inside front) which, all else being equal, should increase the amount of front grip, which in turn promotes oversteer.
[/quote]
I read an article by 034 Motorsport a long time ago and they only recommended changing out the rear sway bar on a B5/6/7 car to get more oversteer. If both the front and rear sway bars are changed then the relationship stays the same the car will still understeer. With my B6 S4 I installed the Hotchkis RS4 big rear sway bar and it made a noticeable difference with kicking the rear out but it wasn’t an extreme change. It seems like a reoccurring theme throughout the article that AWD decreases the effect between changes in front or rear end grip and I agree.

[quote=“DSM article”]The net result of trying to create power-on oversteer on an AWD with a 50/50 diff is a car that likes to occasionally snap-spin on corner entry or midphase. It makes for a very difficult and unforgiving car, especially in transitions or the rain. The car will also be slower than a car set up to maximize grip. And you still probably won’t get the car to exhibit power-on oversteer anyway
[/quote]
I have noticed this with my car at times. Especially on a skid pad while trying to modulate the throttle. I was at an education day and the instructor was trying to teach me how to modulate the throttle while going around a circular skid pad to have the rear end come out then go back. I was at a point where if I let off the throttle then it was snap oversteer and I was spinning in circles with both feet in (clutch/brake). If I gave it more throttle then the back end would slide out and I had to apply counter steer, then I was drifting pretty controllably. This has happened to me on certain road courses also. There was noticeable oversteer midphase through a corner if I got on the gas too early/hard into the corner and I had to apply counter steer to keep the car going where I wanted. It is actually nice for really sharp hair pin corners but longer more gradual corners require a more delicate touch. Good examples of this is at VIR. Turn 12/Oak Tree at VIR I have to roll on the throttle because if I jump on it then the back end will come out enough that I have hit the gaters on the far left side of the straight with the left rear tire. I really struggle with Turn 1 at VIR because it is such a long sweeping right hand turn and I can mess it up pretty easily. One of the instructors that I had at VIR drove a B5 S4 and he would understeer through turn 1 really badly but I didn’t. Instead I would end up cutting the turn too tight or spin out. The only time that I get understeer is when I am spinning all four tires at once, which does happen.

To give you some background with my B6 S4. My S4 has the JHM 4:1 center diff and Wavetrac LSDs in the front and rear. It also has most all of the other power mods that JHM sells like SC, Headers, FI 2.5" catback, modified intake manifold + spacers, and a bunch of other stuff.

Also there is a right hand uphill turn in my neighborhood that can make my car’s ESP flip out if I leave traction control on. I can feel the front end lose grip then the power transfers to the back and it loses grip and then the car can’t decide which end is going to lose grip and finally it straightens out and goes up the hill. Very frustrating turn for like two seconds with traction control on and a heavy right foot though.

This part is about the Torsen LSDs:

[quote=“DSM article”]It does, however, have a couple of quirks. The first is that it is only availible in a 50/50 torque split (and that may or may not be a consequence of the design, I don’t know). The second is that it requires a little bit of resistance from the inside wheel to “push against” before it can start locking. The net result is that unless there is a secondary locking mechanism installed in parallel (like a clutchpack or viscous) if a wheel comes off the ground the Quaife in that slot becomes an open diff.
[/quote]

  1. We know that Torsens can be F40:R60 or even better still with the Crown gears so that part is no applicable any more.
  2. That is true but the Wavetrac LSDs use a cammed piece so that if a wheel is lifted then it creates internal load to keep the LSD function.

To give even more background on my car. I got the JHM 4:1 center diff mod first and it made a slight difference making the rear end more tail happy but I wasn’t happy with the change because I wanted more. Then I got the rear Wavetrac LSD and that made the car slightly more tail happy but it felt weird to me. The front end did lose grip easy too. So then I kept bugging Wavetrac to make me the front LSD and I had to ship them my front factory open diff for them to make their LSD version. There is more to this story in the AZ thread that you posted a link to. The Wavetrac front LSD made the biggest difference of the three diff mods. It made the steering easier (especially at low speeds) and more controllable when the rear end was going tail happy.

EDIT: Since I got Wavetrac to make a front LSD for the 0A3 transmission that is used in both the B6/7 S4s and RS4s (the RS4s use different gear ratios but they are coded as the 0A3 manual transmission) then the B6/7 S4 front LSD fits the B7 RS4. I think that BenSTI also got the Wavetrac front LSD. Kind of pricey for a LSD though. In comparison for the rear LSDs, JHM’s is much more reasonable price wise than Wavetrac.

EDIT #2: I am about to pass out but I thought that I should mention that wider tires helps get rid of both understeer and oversteer. Both understeer and oversteer are caused by a loss of grip and wider tires allow more grip because of the wider contact patch. For example my S4 from the factory runs 235/40/18 tires and currently I am running 265/35/18 tires. I know that they have made a big difference as far as the handling through turns goes. I bring this up because a lot of RS4 guys go from the stock 255/35/19 tires to 275/30/19 tires and that does seem to make a noticeable difference for them as well. Later this year I will be trying out wider tires still than my current 265/35/18 tires to see if they make a bigger improvement but that will be a bit before I get to that point. There is a downside though to running wider tires and most likely wider wheels. That downside is that a wider tire and most likely wider wheel will weigh more and cause more drag. That additional drag will slow down straight line performance and it puts more stress on other driveline components like axles, differentials, etc. I have broken a shit ton of left front inner CV joints because of my wider tires/wheels and my aggressive launches while at the dragstrip.

I did a bunch of research on LSD before fitting one to my TDI MKIV Jetta, and came to the conclusion that Wavetrac was the way to go. The DSM article reinforced that for me in an isolated case.

Jimmy, your post is highly enlightening. Thank you for getting Wavetrac to make front and rear diffs for our B7 RS4s.

I recently returned from instructing at our local Audi Club Winter Driving School at Team O’Neil in northern NH (http://naaclub.org/?event=winter-driving-school-i). I can echo Jimmy’s sentiments about throttle transition and weight transfer having a major impact on under and oversteer.

It was also interesting to see the difference between a 50:50 center diff B7 S4 and my 4:1 center diff RS4 in very low coefficient conditions. While we both made glorious sounds when we punched it at the hairpin slalom turn, I was far more able to get my car to rotate by breaking loose the rear than was my student in her S4. My car also exhibited a much more balanced under/oversteer configuration on the skidpad, with me able to induce and maintain either under- or oversteer with either throttle or velocity.

The 4:1 center diff in our RS4s changes some of the observations in the DSM article, but Jimmy’s post above fixes that. Using the brakes to cause an open front or rear diff to act like an electronic LSD on our cars has both the inherent latency limitation of any electronically controlled LSD mentioned in the article, plus it beats on the brakes.

I suspect the Hot Ticket (™) is the RS4 4:1 TORSEN center diff, with Wavetrac front and rear, much as Jimmy already has. Smart man.

Great information…

Just wanted to add that the B7 S4s had a split year for center diff I believe. Mine had a 40:60, what year was the girls car. The overall difference you may have felt could have actually been the better gearing of the RS4. You also can’t forget the differences in suspension components (sway bars and DRC) that drastically improved the feel of the RS4 over S4. Do either of you have any modifications? Or was this a stock for stock comparison?

Correct. 05.5 B7’s had the 50:50 like the B6’s. But the the 2006 B7 went to the 40:60

Not sure of year, but suspect it was a recent B7 S4, so likely the 60:40 center diff. Both suspensions stock. Both cars on pretty decent snows.

I’ve got a fair amount more experience driving in low CF conditions than did my student, so that likely has some effect. I did not drive the S4, only observed from the passenger seat as I was instructing.

The rapid under-/over-/understeer transitions were easily observed in both cars, and virtually independent of driver, as we were at such low speeds.

Fun times, both that Winter Driving School, and this thread.

How did you manage to fit 265 tires on a B7 S4? Are you not experiencing excessive rubbing?

B6 S4.

I rolled the fenders and I am running 18x9 ET 25 wheels. There is a good 1-1/4" between the inside of the front tires and the wheel bearing housing/steering knuckle in the front and over two inches of room between the rear tires and the rear shocks. The closest thing to the rear tires is the rear shocks because everything else is farther away. Here are pictures of the setup before my car went to the body shop.

http://audirevolution.net/forum/index.php?topic=995.msg111365#msg111365

Then currently at the body shop they are rolling them out wider still. Here are pictures that I told of the left rear quarter panel. Right now I have my winter wheels/tires on (255/40/18 - 18x9 et 25).

http://audirevolution.net/forum/index.php?topic=995.msg112330#msg112330

I also have wider wheels still on order to try out something a little crazier.

I’m also running 18x9 et30 with 265/35 tires on my B6. I had to add a little negative camber. No rubbing in front at all, minimal in back on large dips at high speeds.

I have -1.5* up front and -2.5* in back but only because I had to run 5mm spacers making it et25. Otherwise the back would be perfect.

Oops I forget to mention the negative camber. I am running -1.0 degrees camber all around. I think stock is like 0.5 positive camber for a B6 S4 but it has been a few years since I had to align a B6 S4 to stock settings. Pretty sure that the RS4s run like -1.5 degrees of camber from the factory, just for reference.

Looks like you need to respray everything after the widening. Isn’t a full respray (properly done) crazy expensive?

Nope, I have seen full respray quotes between 3K to 5K. That is the same color as before and usually without door jambs.

Good info!

Reading over all the posts I get a sense that there are several things that can be done that will help the understeer situation without resorting to installing an LSD. Such as wider tires, rear sway bar and coilovers.

Since the LSDs tend to be expensive is there a combination of solid rear sway bar, wider (front?) tires and coilovers that would yield the same benefits as an LSD or is there no comparison? Is an LSD that much different and worth the total investment? I’m not interested in tracking the car just spirited driving on public roads. Maybe just installing a front LSD for public roads would give you the best bang for the buck?

You’re going to need to garage that thing after it gets painted. If I remember correctly your backyard was covered by huge trees (probably oak) and you’ll cringed every time you hear acorns hit it after dropping 50-75ft.

This is a topic that I am currently debating in my head.

Having a B6 S4 (2005), it came with the 50:50 center diff and open diffs front/rear. My first mod (loooong time ago lol (2007)) were both front/rear sways. As stated, because the front was upgraded along with the rear, the car was not neutral but still had understeer. It is just that the limits were increased and the car cornered flatter. I then installed the upgraded 40:60 and like JimmyBones, I noticed a difference but was not overly impressed. The car’s handling characteristic was a tendency to slightly oversteer, but nothing major.

The biggest change I made was about 2 years ago, I went to a friend’s shop (races Porsche cup cars) and told him I was not satisfied with still with the handling (went into real specifics with him, not just ‘I want it to have the tail come around more’). The car also has KWs V3, adjustable upper CA, solid mounts, etc; so it was nicely adjustable. With some simple adjustments to the dampening/rebound and slightly more aggressive alignment specs, the car is extremely neutral with a feeling that the rear wants to come around progressively. The on-center steering is extremely direct now with no slop and mid corner bumps which used to have more sway in the front end rather than the rear, are now glued to the ground.

So my debate is, should I upgrade to a LSD (rear, front, both)? As the limits of the car are close/past, the power isn’t being put down. Prior to the limits, the handling is amazing however once the slip starts occurring, I feel a LSD will allow the car to keep the power down seeing as both wheels will continue to have full power. Would JHMs LSD suffice or is the WaveTrac that much better? Thoughts?

Blah2 glad to hear having your suspension tuned made you happy. Im bringing my car to a shop next month when my summers go back on and we are spending the day fine tuning my KW’s and then corner balancing it. I have the JHM LSD and will be installing it at that time as well (already running the 4:1).

However, my car is a TIP so I may not have the same control you all do. We will see if the JHM TIP tune will let me keep it in gear without shifting for me when in paddle mode.

Blah2, my opinion is that the difference between helical (JHM, TORSEN, Quaife, etc) and Wavetrac is really only once one side of the diff is at or approaching zero ability to accept torque. Helicals at that point start to resemble open diffs, whereas Wavetrac starts to resemble a spool.

Low CF conditions, lifting a corner, all point to Wavetrac for me. If you’re considering summer track use only, and your suspension setup is such that you are unlikely to be lifting a corner, a helical might be OK. Why take the chance, though? Why not just go Wavertrac?

Thanks for the replies guys and sorry for the late response.

Iduff, the car will be at the track often, however it is not a full dedicated track car. It still has full interior and is very street friendly. I have chosen to go with the JHM mainly because the ease of obtaining it (the car is currently @ JHM) and the price. I am sure I won’t be disappointed in the JHM unit however time will tell. Most of the tracks where I am do have decent surfaces with exception of one, which would be a good test of low CF conditions and the JHM unit.

FastEddie, I have never driven a TIP S4 but I can agree that holding the gear is ideal. It took a bit of work to get it dialed in (lots of testing and trial/error) and eliminate a lot of the little annoyances FOR ME in the handling characteristicof the car. I am not sure if you have done this with the KW’s BTW but I drilled a hole in the front shock tower to have access to adjust the rebound. This way you won’t need to remove the fronts each time to adjust the rebound.

Thanks for the inputs.

Very cool, best of luck, be sure to report back with any observations. I’d be happy to revise my Wavetrac position, based on more data, if it points that way.