Data Log Compilation

B6/7 S4/RS4
#15

I’ll do this next time.
can someone offer to tell how to load my log?

#16

10.9 60-130? :o

That’s only .78 sec’s slower than a tune/intake/exhaust Gallardo. Who I believe is hovering around 560HP. You sure that time is accurate??

Are you using VAG or a PBOX of sorts?

#17

This is the typical standard for VAG logging. For the RS4 we measure time from 3K-8.2K in 3rd but often times the soft limiter kicks in around 8,080/8,100 and can screw things up a bit.

#18

he is using vag

#19

yea now I’m going to have to buy a vbox. I want to know my accurate time. I says +/- .034s

#20

Just post on a local car forum that you want to pbox your car. Plenty of guys around there will have one. Save the five hundred bucks.

#21

Saki , I have to buy one or they will never release a newer version. IE: gopro hero3 >:(

#22

lol

You have that luck do you? :slight_smile:

Could be worse…you could have been one of the Europe guys who bought an RS5 in 2012, only to have Audi facelift it six months later!

#23

Saturday 20 October 2012 19:59:02:44427 VCDS Version: Release 11.11.4 Data version: 20120807
OBD — --- –
Marker TIME PID A - 013 TIME PID B - 016 TIME PID C - 012 TIME PID D - 014
STAMP Vehicle speed ( km/h) STAMP Mass Air Flow ( g/s) STAMP Engine RPM ( /min) STAMP Ignition timing advance for cyl #1 ( Degrees)
0.51 65 0.68 13.47 0.16 1702 0.34 30
1.19 65 1.37 10.33 0.85 1698 1.02 7.5
1.88 64 2.05 17.88 1.54 1517 1.71 18.5
2.57 62 2.74 20.75 2.22 3128 2.4 1.5
3.25 62 3.42 57.86 2.91 3127 3.08 25.5
3.94 65 4.11 72.36 3.59 3219 3.76 34.5
4.63 70 4.8 144.05 4.28 3467 4.46 35
5.32 78 5.48 166.55 4.97 3699 5.14 27.5
6 86 6.17 186.52 5.65 4304 5.83 27.5
6.68 99 6.85 210.19 6.34 4753 6.51 26
7.37 108 7.55 246.33 7.03 5233 7.2 25.5
8.05 118 8.23 268.36 7.72 5732 7.89 27.5
8.74 126 8.92 291.5 8.41 6276 8.58 28.5
9.43 136 9.6 307.36 9.09 6796 9.25 26
10.12 145 10.29 317.22 9.78 7145 9.94 27
10.81 154 10.97 332.02 10.46 7591 10.63 27.5

ambient temp 75f
fuel capacity 2/5 93octane
oil temp 201f

#24

jnaut. While I think this is a bad idea because you are going to be only 1 of maybe 5 guys that is going to do this right and to not have to cut your logs to make it look like your car is faster then it ireally is. A tip for posting on the forums with blocks of information like what you did is to… first copy the data from excel and then paste it into word document. Then copy it from the word document directly into the reply box. that will make the log look more like a log. This will depend on your word version you need to have the 10 or better version.

#25

jnaut. While I think this is a bad idea because you are going to be only 1 of maybe 5 guys that is going to do this right and to not have to cut your logs to make it look like your car is faster then it ireally is. A tip for posting on the forums with blocks of information like what you did is to… first copy the data from excel and then paste it into word document. Then copy it from the word document directly into the reply box. that will make the log look more like a log. This will depend on your word version you need to have the 10 or better version.
[/quote]
maybe its a little easier to read? I do understand what your saying but most of the drama resides in the B5 world. we will see…

#26

another option would be to select the range in excel, copy, then paste into paint and save as a jpg, then post the image.

Better option if the forum can handle it, would be to format it as an html table, that way it can be re-imported into excel.

#27

http://audirevolution.net/addons/albums/images/729968961.jpg

#28

P.S. Cue the ensuing “my maf is bigger than your maf” battle of ineptitude

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8096136
What do your MAF values look like?

#29

well I know my car has a stock ecu as throttle angle is limited, even in third gear its at low 60% until 5k then it goes to only 85% to redline.

Edit: So I see that I dont have as many data line, I assume this is because of my sample rate being slow. Is there a way to correct this or is it just the way it is?

#30

Yes, hit “Turbo!” once you’ve selected the blocks to measure and before you begin logging. This speeds up the sample rate.

Thanks for contributing, will be good to compare stuff.

#31

we had a secret betting pool on your car being tuned already after the 12.2 lol. Good to see that it is not.

that throttle limitation will disappear if it is hot enough. It’s our theory that it is kicked in when ‘torque’ values registered in the ECU are beyong a certain point. On a hot day when you’re pulling a bunch of timing and just not making torque, the limiter can be 0%. When it is cool it can be 70%. When it’s ideal out, it is around 52%.

#32

who won?lol

#33

haha we didn’t get that far. We were all really hoping you weren’t tuned so there’d be more potential upside.

to be honest that 12.26 will be tough to beat no matter what but I am REALLY pulling for you.

#34

Thanks man!! I plan to reconsider forced induction , once I reach 11.6/11.7’s on motor.

Ill log some tomorrow using “turbo” option. Maybe log some with race fuel.