With that in mind wouldn’t negative pressure in the crankcase then encourage blow-by?
Also, 2 x 22mm pipes ensure that there is no pressure.
Can you elaborate what part you mean when you say “the closed ring gaps”, what part do you refer to?
A working PCV-system is still letting a lot of oil (relatively) in to the intake manifold, and then there is the longlivity of the PCV in it self.
The previous owner had it replaced a year ago at Audi in germany and already it is broken again. When I removed the manifold to clean the valves, 250-300ml of oil was sitting in the manifold, only way it can get there is from the PCV (also the water cooled pipe from the PCV to the manifold was full of it).
As I said before, my A3 with free venting crank had no problems at 335.000km, that’s 160.000km, over 7 years, with no mechanical failure and no engine parts replaced (The EGR was deleted as well).
I’ve seen multiple cars run fine for years with a free venting crank, from 3-cylinder to V8’s, and not just old v8’s ;).
If you read around the internet, and that’s a bad start to begin with, many people has the same concerns as you.
And equally the other way around. And I get that people are concerned.
Thanks for the welcoming!
I’ll be the ignorant guinea pig with this controversial fix, maybe start my own topic with interval reports, huh?