is is true about some damper in the hydraulic clutch line?

http://www.racesonoma.com/documents/wnd-results-aug7.pdf

scroll down to round one street where I got my ass handed to me in the first round for cutting a horrid light and breaking out huge. happy now?

I think my experiences at my local tracks and the customer that I have that races Super gas/super comp know have an intimate level of experience that you and I bot DON’T have.

I know about treating a track, altering tire pressure but do not own a a kestrel 4250, but do know hot to adjust throttle stops.

Funny thread is funny.

I have seen pbox data from sacramento. It’s not short. It’s not straight downhill. It’s just a typical nhra track that happens to be in the ocean with awesome da.

Same goes for pbir . It’s another track where everyone has good results. However we have seen pbox data there as well, and all is well.

Fact is jhm has run good times at sac but many of their times and traps have been beaten Or matched by customers around the country. Like at englishtown. Or Cayuga. Or carolina. Or pbir.

Good to know about JHM results duplicated at other tracks. That is solid enough credibility for me.

When I used to race against those gmc syclones, they would fly out of the hole with a super quick 1/8 mile but finish with a trap speed of 93 mph…crazy torque

and about chrisk, what’s his story? why does he have to slam me? my dog didn’t eat my timeslips, they were really recycled. I do have a cat, but we’ll avoid the cat A5/S5 thing. Cat did steal my porkchop two weeks ago and growled at me when I took it back. but those weren’t time slips. I’ve emailed the track asking for them

and if you want to see Chrisk’s stable, it’s here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/chriskober/page1/…and that’s a Grand National folks, not a GNX.
Perhaps chrisk sold the gnx and also had or purchased a grand national but…if it isn’t
Gnx had added on fender flares, which Chrisk’s car does not
Gnx has A GNX emblem on the front grill and rear deck, Chrisk’s has a GN logo on the rear deck, not the GNX . I had extras because I was gonna do that stupid gold plating…remember when that was popular? but I didn’t
GNX has a special diff cover made of aluminum and reads GNX and it was glued on with permatex anerobic sealer at ASC, which Chrisk’s GNX does not.
Gnx has a torque arm bolted to the diff, I don’t see it on Chrisk’s diff having the attatchment, but perhaps he upgrades away from the 8" ring gear 10 bolt diff?
GNX had a set of killer looking gills on the front fender behind the wheel well, Chisk’s does not.
GNX had no emblems on the fender, but you can see grand national emblems indicating this is a GN
Gnx and this GN in 87, were both intercooled. chrisk’s gnx, that looks like a GN with some 16" gnx rims, both have the 87 blacked out grill. 86 gn grill had chrome trim-horizontal piece on the top of a blacked out grill.
chrisk’s gn, gnx has an aftermarket intercooler in front of the radiator and he has eliminated the factory garret air research intercooler, or the prototype one that garret made for the 547 GNX’s that were sold.
Chrisk most likely has a 4.1 V6 block stroked and has had parts from applied technologies and Ken Dutwieller, I’m not going to google ken’s name to see if I spelled it correctly. Chrisk’ may have swapped out the TH2004R trans that could not hold up under an 11 second GN, or in this case, a GNX.
OE turbo on the GN was a T3, and the GNX was the same but with a ceramic impelar. Chrisk most likely has a larger turbo A/R to accomadate the fatser times and a high stall converter otherwise why waste your time, right? If you want some advice, unsolicted advice, and you are still running drum brakes on the rear, get the non-power brake wheel cylinders with the 7/8" bore size, it will allow for a little more boost at launch
If that car in that garage, and it looks fun and fast, it’s not a gnx, no different that purchasing a RS5 front and for my S5. I don’t do that. nor would I mod out a real GNX, it’s worth too much stock, and any smart person would do what you have done, get a GN and modify it. My GN was owner by Reggie Jackson, Mr October. looks like you have a turbo TA, 89 vintage, pace car to the indy that year and made only 1500 of them. to fit the engine under the hood, the 3.8 heads were replaced by 3.0 buick heads. roller rocker valve train, where are the syclone and the typhoon in your garage picks, two of the worst vehicles to bracket race with in the world, liquid intercoolers with fluctuating elapsed times as high as four tenths…sheesh!
if that GN is supposed to be a GNX, then that is the other “fake” thing on that photostream.

Chrisk , I’m sure you’re a great guy in public, just like I think that if you and I ever met, we’d probably like each other. and your taste in cars…I really like. I miss my gn and seeing the pics of yours reminds me of a fun car. and the speeding tickets and blazing the tires through three gears in the waldo tunnel and filling the tunnel full of smoke…

Chrisk, my auto shop in high school had an 85 regal with 87 gn/t-type/turbo regal components with it. the mass air flow sensor has hand scribed part numbers along with all of the other parts on the electronics. it had no vin on the dash. no posi either. they got it because a local vo-tech in novato had a teacher, Bob White, that used to be a engineer for GM back in the day. that high school car got me hooked on that type of car.
oh, chrisk, if you don’t have that x brace, aftermarket installed behind the rear seat, get it before you get “the crack” that most g body cars get above that little side rear pillar window on the steel. almost all get it, especially if the car goes as quickly as your does, it may have already occured with the amount of runs you have on the car. kenne belle or kirbans or eastern performance had it, I forget…

Lol wrong Chris K

You’re failing

Note the license plate. Illinois

.

http://i375.photobucket.com/albums/oo193/sakimano/Screenshot_2013-08-10-20-43-11_zps09d73b5f.png

spojke say something like a I feel statment then have a sting of events that make no sence like you recyleed your time slips and can’t prove anything from sac being a fast track or that you even went to the track is just crazy.

Try readying below…

in the future try not being such a huge fail…and as saki noted try again not my car… I love how now 3 times you have just made up shit and thought thats what what…the best part is you bable on and on abott it. spookie and funny all at the same time.

so your rebuttle to my facts are a 10 paragraph post about GM products. Its good to see you have some idea on some cars. Maybe tracks are not your thing then.

I’m sorry for depesperately attempting to discredit you for dismissing my visit to the tracks. I generally don’t save time slips in a binder, or spray ice water in an intake manifold betwwen runs, or ice down an intake box. I never did, even when I USED to Race 15 years ago. yeah, I’m rusty, as anyone would be.
I’m working on acquiring timeslips, I’ve emailed the Sonoma raceway.
you want FACTS:
http://www.racesonoma.com/documents/wnd-results-aug7.pdf
yeah, it’s recycled, your words, but it is FACT and independant of any timeslip which could be from ANY race car. whoever wishes to veify it can by looking at my memebr info form months ago when I joined this forum.
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20130810/lifestyle/130809501
independant article written by someone who interviewed me for competing on the evening that I have been discredited from.

The submitted information on this can be matched up to the time slip data, when I had possession of my timeslips, of my elimination run

until I have timeslips, that match up to street class entrant #81, emailed to me by the track, this INDEPENDANT information stands on it’s own merit.

again, I apologize to attempting to trounce you. I’ll try, in the future, to ignore insults from trolling and not step it up in the future.

wow here is what a troll is

[quote]32Spoke, 42. An auto parts store owner from Petaluma, he came on a recent Wednesday for the first time in years with his 2012 Audi S5.
[/quote]
ok she didn’t see you. You told her you were there. This isn’t an witness this is some random laidy looking to do a news article.

Since you know so much here is a lesson on how your FACTS suck.

JHM sac race way RS4 12.2 @ 111
customer not at sac race way 12.2 112
customer not sac race way 12.5.112
All RS4 cars all the same mods.

JHM sac race way Supercharged B6 S4 11.9 116
customer non sac race way 11.92 116
same mods

JHM Sac race way NA B6 s4 12.98 @ 107
customer non sac race way 12.83 @ 106.6
customer non sac race way 12.99 @ 107

JHM sac race way B5 S4 11.1 @ 130
customer non sac race way 11.2 @128 same mods

oh deffintily a fast track when just 2 min of research shows your way wrong. These tracks are from all over the country

Let me try another tact:
If a random lady interview me, and I already wrote the about the chain of contact and what I wrote my contact information upon, and who I gave it to, then you could surmise that with her article, and the documented first round of elimination. matches up my name and the car/typo’d and my dial in time and break out and bad reaction time.

I have two independant sources linking me to this event on this day. it is statistically not likely for her to open a phone book for 7 bay area counties which has a higher population than some states and find me.

I’m curious as to why you dispute these facts they are more corroborative of my placement at the day and time of the event. and there’s a time.

tell me I’m wrong? If I provide you with timeslips, would that be the silver bullet you are looking for? if it is, and I ask someone, like Don Glenn, who was out at the track-two cars, and asked him for his timeslips, the only way you could dispute those timeslips would be to compare the race number against the FACTS that I provided.

The only other methods of verification is for you to witness me at the track and they have a live feed for you to do it. then I would have to call you on my cell phone and say, I’m in the next group of cars. Or you come see me at the track.

either way, I’m not going to the track again until I figure out if that damper does exist and how to remove it/bypass it.

you are essentially grinding the napoleonic code on me, and I’m asking you to prove me wrong on my attendance. and the elimination run that the track documented on the link I provided. you can match that time to the one I originally posted. Ironically, that’s when I had all of the slips in my hand. they didn’t come out of thin air.
you did write down times,at sac, to prove me wrong, and I can easily argue that those came out of the air by your same napoleonic code

There is a 1/4 mile list on this site that backs up my post. Your sac is fast comments are as empty as your recycled time slips

can you aknowledge the independant verification of the link to the sonoma raceway that has my ET/first round elimination?

because if you can’t then there’s a problem, that is more legit than any timeslip I can provide, it’s from an independant third party, just like the times posted on this site that you site as fact. and yet you Personally cannot verify all of those facts that you site.

I can. Sakimano runs the 1/4 mile list on thus site It doesn’t get more honest then that. So far the only problem has been your FACTS.

Its been disproved your sac receway and that your internet slooth attempt has fsiled missurbuly when trying to find pictures of my old amd current cars…and your now relying on a reporter that wasnt at the track when you went and whatever

I think you’re confused. Nobody doubts that you ran mediocre times at Sonoma and trapped like a tiptronic b6 s4 avant in your modified b8 s5.

What Chris is showing you is that your sacramento conspiracy theory is ridiculous. And that you’re ridiculous.

The smart people get it… and end thread.

I agree, end of thread.

  1. I’ve been to SAC, tons of gravel. I’d have to tape up may car to run there.
  2. I verified my times, you wanna go to 1320go.com and research, then you have all of my mediocre times and wind directions, D/A. you’ll find they match up with what I’ve already written.
  3. someone else that backs up what I wrote and has actually been to sac.
    http://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w204/393306-new-c63-nos-record-new-overall-mb-record-10-41-133-a-4.html
    the thread matches up with EXACTLY what I was writing about
    I get it, read it and accept it and I also looked at this site. and know anyone has a lost cause to fight you. Chrisk I read in a thread on this site about how you used comments from others to back up your statement, but it’s hearsay, just like what I wrote.
    I will admit to crashing and burning on googling you, and I apologize to you and whoever that other guy is.

and this one too:

http://www.modularfords.com/threads/160121-New-Best-Stock-Auto-5-0

and this one too,

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bUaNo2aWOZIJ:mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w204/429286-finally-ran-1-4mi-sacramento-raceway.html+faulty+timing+sacramento+raceway+forum&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

and this one too, now I know you could care less for the poster, westwest, but perhaps you can look past it and contact vbox.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8QaDgKAtjoAJ:www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/534320-Sacramento-Raceway-1-4-mile-drags-on-REVO-100-octane-tune+calibrated+sacramento+raceway+forum&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

and the last bit of logic, why would any of these people lie about it? there’s no reason, nothing to gain?
so we have read from these links, mph off, too fast, and too slow. these are people that spend money on boxes that I have no interest in.

I used to just drive to the track, make some practice runs and base weather conditions for that day, at that track, and write down my estimated time.

Have you actually read those threads? You claim sac is artificially fast. Great. So the nhra is lying.

But those threads… They show people have trouble there as often as people do well there. Like every funking track.

Westwest and I believe skidrowe both ran very slow times at sac. So I guess the timing equipment was running faulty-slow those days?

Happy2b5 also ran there on a similar setup to what 39nast ran that went high 11s @ 125 at Milan drag way. Happy went 13something.

Let me know when you get your story straight.

Just to clarify, here’s what Westwest said about sacramento

[quote=westwest]Apparently they were not calibrated properly for the trap speed - it was about under reporting by 2 MPH according to people with VBOX gear. The ET times were 100.000% accurate.
[/quote]
Hmmm… So let me get this straight. The ET was 100% accurate compared to pbox. Interesting.

The MPH was reading low vs pbox. Why?

I have explained it on here. Pbox shows terminal MPH at finish line. Nhra dragstrips show average speed over the final 66 feet.

Shocker.

What the hell are you even arguing 32spoke? That Sac is slow…or not accurate, therefore your S5 times weren’t right?