Sounds like a cheesy pickup line.
I’ll start off by saying that I don’t have have much knowledge of this, and I’m just going off my basic physics knowledge and what seems to make sense. Hopefully it gets some discussion going.
So the general consensus for our cars seems to be to shift around 7800 rpm since that’s when the hp curve starts to drop off (and torque is already dropping). However, the thrust curves of the car seem to paint a different picture since thrust is not only about the torque curve but the gearing as well.
Here are thrust curves for a couple bikes:
So, it seems to make sense to try and shift at the point of the curve for the particular gear that would allow you to end up in an rpm range that would give you better thrust than if you had stayed in the previous gear. In the above examples, it would make sense to get out of the gear at bare minimum before the lines intersect at the right side.
So I took the dyno chart I had and decided to plot the thrust curves assuming 255/35/19 wheels. The dots are each 500 rpm from 2.5k-8k.
http://i.imgur.com/ECBSHlJ.png
Way different. If you take a horizontal ruler and slide it upwards, there’s no overlap at all for the first 3 gears at least.
Now, based on my basic understanding of this, wouldn’t it make the most sense to go all the way to the redline for us to get the best thrust/acceleration in the first 2 gears at least? (I know it’s picking hairs since it’s just 200 rpm different, but bear with me).
In fact, if in some imaginary world our engines could go up to say 10k rpm,the torque would indeed keep dropping, but up to a certain point, it would still be producing more thrust than the next gear up (for gears 1/2)
So what’s the deal here? Am I interpreting these graphs wrong or does it make more sense to wind it out as much as possible in those gears to get better acceleration?
So something like:
1-2: redline
2-3: redline
3-4: 7800?