I think you are talking around the issues to point out that I was wrong on something, but you’re losing sight of the discussion. You might be right…there may be more cfm than a similar displacement na car when he is at nearly 0 boost. How much?
Let’s put it another way. If he is making a supposed 300wtq at 3500rpm (which is irrelevant because he was launching at 2800 but let’s pretend), that would mean…
All motor he is making around what… 180wtq (generous)?
So boost, which is low single digits to zero, is adding 120 wtq ?
At 3500 rpm that is a difference of around 80 whp or about 100 crank hp. So using a general rule of thumb that you need 150cfm to make 100 crank hp, that means you are saying his nearly idle turbos (sorry, turbo) is moving an extra 150 cfm.
Sounds extremely optimistic.
Want to play with grams per second instead (on a car that may have been tuned to make that irrelevant. scaled maf? )?
Again using an approximation, you are saying the turbos are moving an extra 100 grams per second in order to make the approximate 80whp required. That is a fantasyland log dyno from that creep who lives in his mom’s basement however… Can’t remember his name… , so I’m not sure g/sec ‘dynos’ make a load of sense as ‘the answer’
Anyway do we see that anywhere? Do we see his turbo moving an extra 150 cfm way down there at low boost?
What did his dyno show?