He does have a point and I want to apologize for making that statement. I don’t like posting under the user (F.A.W). Things got complicated and confusing, so let me try to explain. 1) I was trying to get my karma to 0 in a desperate attempt at getting Fastestaudiwagon to be my user name. 2) When I made the 0 karma post, euroswager said that nobody wanted to see my car run at the track, assumed he spoke for everyone. I then decided that running my car would be a waste of video and a wasted trip to MIR. 3) I took a trip to Maryland last week to visit my friend and possibly run my car at MIR and hopefully see Adam chestnuts run his car. If his car was at the track I was going to run mine. I got to Maryland on a Sunday. My aeromotive 340 fuel pump died in Md while doing a pull against a new z06. I Put a factory pump in temporarily on Monday. I then decided to go to Atlanta to visit my other friend, who live 10 miles away from summit racing. Got to my friends house at about 1:pm and then to summit and special ordered a Walbro f90000267 next day air.
On my way back from Atlanta I wanted to go to MIR on March 16 and 17th, but the track was rained out. I wanted to go back to MIR this Saturday, but I think that taking my 3 beautiful daughters Easter egg hunting may be my best decision. Again, I really don’t like posting under this faw name. I would be enthusiastic about going to the track if I could post as Fastestaudiwagon.
My car still has it’s regular problems and will be going to the track soon.
I shouldn’t have to earn that name. It’s just a name I decided to call my wagon for fun. When I tried to sign up to this forum, I wasn’t allowed to use that name. I always thought it strange, now you tell me to earn the name. It almost sounds as if someone is purposely denying me the use of the name. This forum is full of users who probably have other names on other forums. I just want to be recognized as Fastestaudiwagon.
I understood exactly what you were saying and I appreciate it. I don’t have a wagon anymore and your post made me think deeper about my situation. It made me think that the owner of the forum probably feel like I should earn the name rather than just use the name. I’m sorry if it appeared like I was attacking you.
Cool bro…I highly doubt tbe owner ir anyone cares what yiyr user name is…if you tried to sign up for the site under that name and it didnt let you maybe someone already has that name…or maybe its too many charicters…
This will be my last post on this user name topic. 1) why would someone else want to use Fastestaudiwagon as there user name knowing that I have been using it for over 6 yrs.
2) maybe I joined this forum when they first launched and I forgot that I did, or someone else used the name? It would be on the list of users and I didn’t see it.
3) Some people may feel that whomever has the fastest wagon should be entitled to that name. For example, there was a mod who is on Audizine who told me that he was trying to use Fastestaudiwagon@gmail, or AOL, but couldn’t get it. He then told me that I was the reason why he couldn’t get it, because the are both my email addresses. He owns a wagon.
4) (a)Judeisnotobscure, is a member on this forum. His name has 16 characters. (B) Fastestaudiwagon, is not a member. The name has 16 characters also.
[quoteauthor=EYEspI link=topic=1615.msg41259#msg41259 date=1364515277]
God probably doesn’t like you, I wouldn’t read too much into it
[/quote]
So Funny and so wrong on so many levels
You’re too intelligent to not understand where you are being intentionally misleading (aka lying), so you’re either a cowardly liar who can’t nut up and tell the truth in spite of not wanting to, or you are a truely self-deluded fool.
Take the bolded part of your quote above for a lie that you tirelessly perpetuate. You say that I had transmission issues and an incomplete fueling setup only AFTER faw tried to make it so that he would only run a damaged car. This is objectively false and is a blatant lie, as proven in my previous post (which I will quote again below). The original challenge itself talked explicitly about my tranny, the non-complete status of my car, and the extended time-frame of the challenge. This didn’t happen afterwards.
Your ‘interpretation’ of objectively verifiable claims does not relieve you from the facts. Not everything in life is subjective, and there exist things that are simply objective facts. Many of the false claims in your ‘interpretations’ are regarding FACTS that are not subject to interpretation, and you are perpetuating LIES about them. That is low, and I assume the majority of the forum is intelligent enough to see through your SPIN.
Of course that’s how you remember it, and I wouldn’t expect any less from your notoriously biased witticisms and your skewed renderings of events that you love to try to pass off as ‘honest nutshell synopsis’ of past events. Your wrong accounting of what happened is not because you’re not well educated; it’s because you are self-deluded.
Pro-tip though, if you are going to lie about things, you should make sure that the things that you lie about are not so readily exposed (on your home forum nonetheless). Also, it doesn’t lend positive credence to the ‘truth speaker’ facade that you try so hard to portray to lie directly to the people who know better because they saw it happen first-hand.
If you want to try to act like my original challenge was some sort of a “I’ll run you tomorrow, as-is” challenge, you might want to brush up on my very first posting of the challenge, located here:
Quoted verbatim FROM THE VERY FIRST, THE ORIGINAL CHALLENGE POST I MADE ON AR (as seen in the link above).
Note the explicit mentioning of my damaged transmission, the extended (yet to be determined and yet to be mutually agreed upon) timeframe, and the explicit provision of the car being in complete track running shape.
[u][b]No matter how many times you repeat a lie, it will never make it true.
Attempting to psychologically manipulate by continually repeating things that you know are not true only serves to make you look like a self-decepted fool.[/b][/u]
[quote=“EYEspI,post:135,topic:4218”]
For sure, I appreciate your intentions.
They’ll continue to bash whether or not I reply, and they’ll likely continue to lie whether or not I objectively prove them wrong (as evidenced by Saki’s post #117 above). I have no delusions that everything will be kosher after I straighten out their BS, and if my end goal was simply to ‘limit their bashing’, that would likely be best done by ‘never coming back to AR’. This is just an exercise pretty much for me to expose their lies, for when I have time, and it will likely continue perpetually as they continue to lie and as I randomly drop by to call them out on their lies. Not the biggest thing I have to worry about right now.
They’ll continue to bash whether or not I reply, and they’ll likely continue to lie whether or not I objectively prove them wrong (as evidenced by Saki’s post #117 above). I have no delusions that everything will be kosher after I straighten out their BS, and if my end goal was simply to ‘limit their bashing’, that would likely be best done by ‘never coming back to AR’. This is just an exercise pretty much for me to expose their lies, for when I have time, and it will likely continue perpetually as they continue to lie and as I randomly drop by to call them out on their lies. Not the biggest thing I have to worry about right now.
[/quote]
Ain’t that the truth
i got banned in part for telling everyone on AZ that epl blows up engines(even explained why),but the dumb fucks in washington state and the rest of you amd/epl cheerleaders JUST HAD TO LEARN THE HARD WAY… and im VERY happy now thank you dumb fucking cheerleaders