from the other thread…
I have a spreadsheet with all of my RS4 timeslips pumped in to it, so I can see all my times on my Kumho Excsta or whatever they were called (directional)Toyo Proxes R vs. my Continental Sport Contact 2 vs. my Michelin Pilot Sports. My car has been bone stock all the way through, and has always run the 94 octane Sunoco/Petro Canada fuel, and has always been around the same track weight for each pass.
Conti averaged 1.92
Toyo Proxes R averaged 1.84
Michelin averaged 1.90
This should be pretty apparent to show what I’m referring to. My theory is that the channeled tires are just too much air and not as much contact, and when they’re spinning that contact patch (or lack of it) is the same, whereas the directional tires have a better patch.
Here’s the tread pattern on the tires Pinoy liked…
http://www.dunloptyres.com.au/gdt_supplied_images/DZ101%20200x200%20.jpg
here’s the tread pattern on the ones I thought worked best for me. Correction from above, they were Toyo Proxes R
http://www.gorettigomme.com/public/pneu/images/124604664364901IMG.JPG
Here’s the ones that didn’t work well for me. Conti 2 and Michy PSS. Look at those massive channels…basically air that is not gripping the road when you’re ripping in a straight line. The Michelin’s would win an all around test, but for this discussion, they’re not awesome at launching from a dig.
http://www.pneumaticiroma.it/upload/Prodotto/50/continental_sportcontact3_2.jpg
http://www.michelin.ca/mediabin/Approved/Michelin/Visuals/Digital/tire-pilot-super-sport-hero.png