lulz on other forums (current, not classics)

General Discussion
#5186

Good to see frankenchina and jconz still suck cocks

Two of their stage 3 B5 S4 customers went to the track. 13.8@100 and 14 @ 97.

That platform gets slower every year. Incredible.

[quote=jpurre]So I FINALLY got out to the track after a few set backs. Time slip below. Let the analyzing begin. Car is now .4 sec faster than when it was APR stage 2 (kinda disappointing). Should I get a 85mm maf and tune revision from 3F to full 3?
[/quote]
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1380487_10153120113548083_3248180790851948246_n.jpg?oh=08fa5067fd12d6b5f772d8c8a94a9fcb&oe=552A8318&gda=1428558920_be0c3a7c7eb5b0a79e311b64f73274b4

Then an EpicConzTuning Tial 770 car hit the dyno and made 2008 K04 numbers…430 whp.

He’s running a tune with meth, tuned for meth, and a full stage 3+ build. Pretty incredible that these guys still fall for this shit. I like how he has to wait till 4200 RPM to make 350 wtq. lol.

[quote=S4matt]Took the car to the dyno today. Boosting around 28psi on tial 770’s. Only made 432 hp. Have water meth injection. I feel like something is wrong here. Was a mustang 150 AWD dyno. Thoughts?

http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/10/14/aqetubaz.jpg
[/quote]

#5187

That’s the trend lately. These fucking kids buying the B6 and B7 and wanting to make them obnoxiously loud. I hope it really doesn’t start coming to this.

#5188

mines obnoxiously loud but at least i didn’t just cut the mufflers off. It blows my mind they spent 200-250 to have someone delete their rear mufflers and then one guy asks if it will perform better than a magnaflow ???

#5189

^ LOL really? One is still in 14sec club and the other one barely made it into 13s. I’d be embarrassed to call my B5 S4 “Stage 3” with those numbers at the strip. That’s what B6/7 S4s put down in stock form, actually even faster than that. I guess that’s what happens when you cheap out on power mods… ::slight_smile:

#5190

That’s b6-s4-auto-on-a-hot-day times, lol.

#5191

Thats the B5 S4 struggle, yo…

#5192

Must be the wheel spin

#5193

Fabspeed is junk.

#5194

I think the curves allow the exhaust gases to build up speed, eventually reaching terminal velocity for optimal HP gains. Like this:

http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/toys/detail-page/c26-B007AR24GE-1-l.jpg

#5195

What a tool.

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=634165

#5196

What idiot would post that, if he’s being for real. Either way, he deserves jail for overall douchebaggery.

#5197

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/634116-Muffler-Delete-Q-s

#5198

Wow not sure if real life or completely brain dead… Sigh… No wonder B5 platform runs slower every day.

#5199

Unfortunately that last thread was B6/B7 owners… :’(

#5200

That’s the trend lately. These fucking kids buying the B6 and B7 and wanting to make them obnoxiously loud. I hope it really doesn’t start coming to this.

#5201

mines obnoxiously loud but at least i didn’t just cut the mufflers off. It blows my mind they spent 200-250 to have someone delete their rear mufflers and then one guy asks if it will perform better than a magnaflow ???

#5202

This was posted in response to some PES build thread… I think no one gives a shit anymore, thats likely why they aren’t posting

[QUOTE=MMMB00ST_A4;10442318]As have I. Very fond of Wolf Auto and the service they provide.

Not to stir up drama, but I only seem to see the certain “Naysayers” when your updates are not frequent, or AS SOON as it looked as if you were quitting on a portion of your project. They don’t seem to post at all when things are progressing and new information is provided for the community to gain some MUCH NEEDED knowledge, and possibly save someone some cashola down the road. Funny, huh? [rolleyes]

Keep up the good work and updates, Keith.

-B [az]
[/quote]
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/605864-PES-G4-Stage-2-rebuild-refresh-install-on-my-2007-B7-S4-Cabrio-6MT?p=10442318&viewfull=1#post10442318

#5203

This was posted in response to some PES build thread… I think no one gives a shit anymore, thats likely why they aren’t posting

[QUOTE=MMMB00ST_A4;10442318]As have I. Very fond of Wolf Auto and the service they provide.

Not to stir up drama, but I only seem to see the certain “Naysayers” when your updates are not frequent, or AS SOON as it looked as if you were quitting on a portion of your project. They don’t seem to post at all when things are progressing and new information is provided for the community to gain some MUCH NEEDED knowledge, and possibly save someone some cashola down the road. Funny, huh? [rolleyes]

Keep up the good work and updates, Keith.

-B [az]
[/quote]
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/605864-PES-G4-Stage-2-rebuild-refresh-install-on-my-2007-B7-S4-Cabrio-6MT?p=10442318&viewfull=1#post10442318

#5204

mmmboost is a moron

if the keith guy makes a 112 work…good for him. unfortunately it makes enough torque to kill a 4.2 MPI chain motor. Which he will find out.

The problem with the B67 S4 sc kits is not that the M90 is too small or PES is bankrupt. The problem is the engine is not very strong so you need to protect the fuck out of it. M90 is fine but you can achieve M90 results with bolt ons, so why bother. M112 is a good size but is ificient and as mentioned makes enough torque to kill the motor…and requires a custom kit. If this guy makes it fit…great. Who will tune it? As we saw, picking a nice power making blower and making agreat kit doesn’t guarantee success. The largest Audi tuning company in the world charged $18,000 and failed at adding a TVSr1320 to a B7 RS4. Car went stock fast. They had to call in another company to tune it for them (JHM).

Ironically, that company (JHM) sells a $8000 supercharger kit for the B67 that takes all of this info into account…and is a simple install that has been laid out for you. They’ve run it on their own S4 for 5 years now. Anyone who tries a custom M112 instead is a cheapskate who will learn that he will eventually spend the same as a JHM kit when all is said and done, and his car will be less safe, and in all likelihood, slower. Not to mention out of commission for the next 6 months-1 year while he ‘completes’ the build.

#5205

I have no problem with the guys need to tinker and problem solve…I do have a problem with the idiots speaking of “platform advancement” and for other interested in using this as an option in the future. That talk is just retarded.