TIAL 770 S4 VS GSXR1000

[tweetss4estate]

Only facts I have is his almost one second shifts and a miss-shift. So I was sticking to the info supplied. The run wasn’t monitored so obviously it could have been different. It is still a more accurate presumption than posting other peoples shift times.
The tune isnt why my car doesn pull in 1st and 2nd like it does on 3rd. And the race agains the 335 was not me driving it like I would at the track. Stop trying to pull your shenanigans. When I post up a 10.99 or better will you write a public apology to me, AMD and EPL for falsely defacing? Are you able to set the crown of E-pride that you so wonderfully wear?

Plain and simple it was not a surprise to anyone at AMD or EPL that the 770 car ran what it ran.

Stop being a derelict.
I was saying he has posted 1 second power to power posts, my point was, it could be apart of the problem of the run. He also did miss a gear.

so now it has gone from ‘he was off the power for 3 seconds’ to ‘I noticed this on his one 60-130 run he was off power for 1 second, so I just extrapolated that horrible shift time x 3 at the strip and inserted it’

See…now you know why I ask these questions. Add this to the ‘he was on pump’ and you see why you lose credibility on this forum whenever you show up.

Just focus on facts…it’s much easier. Here are you two comments I questioned…now proven to be bogus

[b]1. It was really close to AMDs trap time on pump gas (128.x).

2. It also makes sense tha the AMD car would be slower looking at his awesome shifting abilities. (at least 3 seconds lost to shifts that’s a lot of time with no acceleration)[/b]

[judeisnotobscure]

This car should now be running a little better than 11.1@130 since we swapped ic’s.
Idk if you saw the difference in the accel logs, but it is decent.

[tweetss4estate]

This car should now be running a little better than 11.1@130 since we swapped ic’s.
Idk if you saw the difference in the accel logs, but it is decent.

No, I feel dumb to say I didn’t see the log. That’s awesome, I think we all knew it had quite a bit left. Mind throwing up a comparison log?

[sakimano]

Lol sure thing. Keep backtracking. You made two big points and both were fabrications. .integrity fail.

Good look running 10s…gonna need some nitrous and a substitute driver for that one…since all amd drivers take 1 second to shift according to you.

Only facts I have is his almost one second shifts and a miss-shift. So I was sticking to the info supplied. The run wasn’t monitored so obviously it could have been different. It is still a more accurate presumption than posting other peoples shift times.
The tune isnt why my car doesn pull in 1st and 2nd like it does on 3rd. And the race agains the 335 was not me driving it like I would at the track. Stop trying to pull your shenanigans. When I post up a 10.99 or better will you write a public apology to me, AMD and EPL for falsely defacing? Are you able to set the crown of E-pride that you so wonderfully wear?

Plain and simple it was not a surprise to anyone at AMD or EPL that the 770 car ran what it ran.

Stop being a derelict.
I was saying he has posted 1 second power to power posts, my point was, it could be apart of the problem of the run. He also did miss a gear.

so now it has gone from ‘he was off the power for 3 seconds’ to ‘I noticed this on his one 60-130 run he was off power for 1 second, so I just extrapolated that horrible shift time x 3 at the strip and inserted it’

See…now you know why I ask these questions. Add this to the ‘he was on pump’ and you see why you lose credibility on this forum whenever you show up.

Just focus on facts…it’s much easier. Here are you two comments I questioned…now proven to be bogus

[b]1. It was really close to AMDs trap time on pump gas (128.x).

2. It also makes sense tha the AMD car would be slower looking at his awesome shifting abilities. (at least 3 seconds lost to shifts that’s a lot of time with no acceleration)[/b]

[tweetss4estate]

Good look to you too sir. I hop you get that letter ready. Make sure its spell checked, I’d like it to be something I can frame and I hope God makes it a sticky at the top of the B5 S4 section.
Funny, I haven’t “backtracked” at all but nice try. Actually, I have answered everything while explaining the logic behind it.

Lol sure thing. Keep backtracking. You made two big points and both were fabrications. .integrity fail.

Good look running 10s…gonna need some nitrous and a substitute driver for that one…since all amd drivers take 1 second to shift according to you.

Only facts I have is his almost one second shifts and a miss-shift. So I was sticking to the info supplied. The run wasn’t monitored so obviously it could have been different. It is still a more accurate presumption than posting other peoples shift times.
The tune isnt why my car doesn pull in 1st and 2nd like it does on 3rd. And the race agains the 335 was not me driving it like I would at the track. Stop trying to pull your shenanigans. When I post up a 10.99 or better will you write a public apology to me, AMD and EPL for falsely defacing? Are you able to set the crown of E-pride that you so wonderfully wear?

Plain and simple it was not a surprise to anyone at AMD or EPL that the 770 car ran what it ran.

Stop being a derelict.
I was saying he has posted 1 second power to power posts, my point was, it could be apart of the problem of the run. He also did miss a gear.

so now it has gone from ‘he was off the power for 3 seconds’ to ‘I noticed this on his one 60-130 run he was off power for 1 second, so I just extrapolated that horrible shift time x 3 at the strip and inserted it’

See…now you know why I ask these questions. Add this to the ‘he was on pump’ and you see why you lose credibility on this forum whenever you show up.

Just focus on facts…it’s much easier. Here are you two comments I questioned…now proven to be bogus

[b]1. It was really close to AMDs trap time on pump gas (128.x).

2. It also makes sense tha the AMD car would be slower looking at his awesome shifting abilities. (at least 3 seconds lost to shifts that’s a lot of time with no acceleration)[/b]

[sakimano]

no, let me remind you

1. you said he spent at least 3 seconds out of the power while shifting…then got called out…then backtracked and admitted you don’t know what he did, and that you were merely extrapolating his 1 second shift on some 60-130 chart (which we know nothing about…i.e. was that a mis-shift and not representative of fuck all?)

2. you said he was on pump gas…then got called out…then backtracked and admitted he was on pump + meth and made some sillly explanation that pump gas means pump+meth on an AMD car.

If you run 10s, I’ll be impressed. However I don’t know what it has to do with you misrepresenting the facts regarding burningcoals. Just as I don’t know what E85 vs. pump+meth has to do with you misrepresenting the facts regarding burningcoals.

(other than an attempt to divert attention from you getting caught tripping over your fantasy land version of the facts to prop AMD/EPL up).

FOCYS on the facts tweets.

[tweetss4estate]

How about you show me where I said “I have divinities evidence that shows 1 second shifts during the 1/4 mile run”
Or did I say, by looking at his 60-130 you can assume shifting is an issue. You could easily say 3 seconds considering he shifts in that manner and if you include the Mis-shift.
No backtracking here saki, but apparently you must be so above my level of thought that I am just a lowly fool.
When I grow up I want to be just like you. I hope my kids can study your posts and take up your example as well.

no, let me remind you

1. you said he spent at least 3 seconds out of the power while shifting…then got called out…then backtracked and admitted you don’t know what he did, and that you were merely extrapolating his 1 second shift on some 60-130 chart (which we know nothing about…i.e. was that a mis-shift and not representative of fuck all?)

2. you said he was on pump gas…then got called out…then backtracked and admitted he was on pump + meth and made some sillly explanation that pump gas means pump+meth on an AMD car.

If you run 10s, I’ll be impressed. However I don’t know what it has to do with you misrepresenting the facts regarding burningcoals. Just as I don’t know what E85 vs. pump+meth has to do with you misrepresenting the facts regarding burningcoals.

(other than an attempt to divert attention from you getting caught tripping over your fantasy land version of the facts to prop AMD/EPL up).

FOCYS on the facts tweets.

[sakimano]

umm…right here

(at least 3 seconds lost to shifts that’s a lot of time with no acceleration)

[judeisnotobscure]

There was a revision made to work with the new ic’s.

http://i714.photobucket.com/albums/ww142/judeisnotobscure/77029psifmicvs32psier.png

This car should now be running a little better than 11.1@130 since we swapped ic’s.
Idk if you saw the difference in the accel logs, but it is decent.

No, I feel dumb to say I didn’t see the log. That’s awesome, I think we all knew it had quite a bit left. Mind throwing up a comparison log?

[sakimano]

looks like a pretty huge change.

Is that car going to hit the strip again soon Tony/Josh? Would love to see it. Get some video and stuff too as it’s sure to be on the verge of a 10 second pass…one of only a few ever made in 4 door Audis. Make sure to get some video and I’m sure God will feature it on the main page of the site.

[tweetss4estate]

Lol, no that is not me saying I have data from the 1/4 mile pull. Sorry King Saki, the extrapolate specialist.

umm…right here

(at least 3 seconds lost to shifts that’s a lot of time with no acceleration)

[aiellos4]

I will be going back very soon in the next few weeks, just finishing up a few revisions on the tuning and should be good to go.

looks like a pretty huge change.

Is that car going to hit the strip again soon Tony/Josh? Would love to see it. Get some video and stuff too as it’s sure to be on the verge of a 10 second pass…one of only a few ever made in 4 door Audis. Make sure to get some video and I’m sure God will feature it on the main page of the site.

[sakimano]

good stuff. Only 3 ten second B5 S4 times. Actually two if you consider the fact that guruman is an A4 with a 2.7T swap. Pretty elite company.

[tweetss4estate]

That’s a HUGE difference. Should be awesome! I can’t wait to run that car

There was a revision made to work with the new ic’s.

http://i714.photobucket.com/albums/ww142/judeisnotobscure/77029psifmicvs32psier.png

This car should now be running a little better than 11.1@130 since we swapped ic’s.
Idk if you saw the difference in the accel logs, but it is decent.

No, I feel dumb to say I didn’t see the log. That’s awesome, I think we all knew it had quite a bit left. Mind throwing up a comparison log?

[Snow_Trooper]

Car is looking sick dude, so glad you are still in this game!

[Coldair]

Not really much to that race & can’t tell if your racing a 1987 ninja, GSXR 600 or 1000 but ok.

[8URV8]

Not really much to that race & can’t tell if your racing a 1987 ninja, GSXR 600 or 1000 but ok.

lmfao

[aiellos4]

Not really much to that race & can’t tell if your racing a 1987 ninja, GSXR 600 or 1000 but ok.

yeah it was a 1950 1000CC GOPED…

[Coldair]

Not really much to that race & can’t tell if your racing a 1987 ninja, GSXR 600 or 1000 but ok.

yeah it was a 1950 1000CC GOPED…

I’m not surprised

[aiellos4]

Not really much to that race & can’t tell if your racing a 1987 ninja, GSXR 600 or 1000 but ok.

yeah it was a 1950 1000CC GOPED…

I’m not surprised

someone is ass hurt…go back to the B6 S4 Forum where you belong