World's Fastest B7 RS4?

B6/7 S4/RS4
#61

No you said it made no difference running 93 because it isn’t tuned for it. I said, that’s wrong. It always makes a difference when things are hot and force inducted.
I NEVER NOR HAVE I OR AM I MAKING FUN OF CV FOR DRIVING AN EXCURSION. I was saying because CV does, I can safely say your ego makes you think you are the most Intellegent audi driver.

Your ignorance continues to try to seep its way into my personal life and relationships with people who don’t deserve you as a friend.

You are wrong about the day, if those are the calculations you have. Jason texted me the day after he ran the recorded run, I went to drag times and calculated it myself. It read -270 so what ever you think it was, you’re wrong. So speaking -4xx is a lie, so YOU are a liar.

#62

If anyone would care to go to said website to said 1/4 list they would not see my pbox time they would also see that the pbox time has its own list and is not considered an official 1/4 time, no more than a FATS time is taken with a grain of salt while logging. I did not elide pbox times with 1/4 mile times. As senior jackass is suggesting.

#63

SHITFORBRAINS

  1. show me where I said 93 fuel makes no difference

  2. show me where you see dragtimes saying that Aviva ran in -270 density altitude. I already showed you the links. You showed fuck all. You ‘calculated’ it.

Pacific was not open May 2nd. They were open for Wednesday test and tune on May 1st. AMD posted about it on quattrofail. Jonathan posted the date in his video. Other members of this site where there.

MAY 1st

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OU6ZMSEHnUU#t=7s

Just apologize, and GTFO.

#64

It’s funny, my karma has gone up since I posted minutes ago… So much for your system saki.

Edit: it went up 3 points until this post lol looks like you saw this post.

#65

SHOW ME YOUR FACTS

http://audirevolution.net/forum/index.php?topic=1818.msg47069#msg47069

#66

^^^ whatever Reid, I’m not sure what you’re defending at this point.

Saki, this is where I put it. /forum/viewtopic.php?t=78

Jason is an asshole and I’m very confused why he has customers stroking him the way they do. I haven’t seen anything overly impressive come from the AMD shops.

#67

May 2nd the DA would have been worse. May 1st the DA would be -3xx the way I see it. If that’s the day the went at around 6:30z so you’re still wrong, and you started off saying it was -800 ass. Wrong again Sakimoron

#68

My point is they claim things as facts and are distorting the truth to make their opinions look better. That’s wrong and lying. Jason has said things that I don’t condone, but I can’t stand by and watch saki and Chris lie about stuff. Not only that they make things look like everything is an absurdity. Most of the people kicked off this forum down have cars at AMD, they don’t have affiliations with AMD, they just didn’t agree with the BS here so they were kicked off.

I can’t find which day they went if it was May 1st then I’m wrong it wasn’t -270 it was -370. Even so it isn’t -800 or whatever he claimed it was.

#69

This is where you say 93 makes no difference.

#70

Anyways. JHM awesome time and way to set the bar higher. Let the rS4 wars begin! I wish y’all the best.

#71

Why is this tweetroll not banned? No one likes him. He is a compulsive liar with a shitty blown up B5 S4…a peasant gargling on AMD

#72

I think the big picture should be considered, clearly AMD has a nice offering here but JHM’s looks to be a better overall option.

#73

I have no Idea why you post here. I see you defending AMD and then backhad comments to JHM. When in fact your very dishonest.

you say fact but you don’t know anything your using the work FACT for AS FACT. let me help


fact that you can build in a buffer in the ECU to maintain optimum advancement and AFR in the ME9 when more octane is introduced(93 would allow at least 2-5 degrees of advancement which is HUGE),

you said this above. So now your making the clame that JHM built a buffer to make 93 work better when using a 91 tune. I know your a good friend (or so he says) of CV but I don’t believe your anything other then someone that is desperate to stick up for AMD. You continue to say crazy things. 91 or 93 you act like the world is so different. Sad part is you don’t really know what your talking about but you want to try and dig AMD out of the hole there in.

Im sorry I have no respect for you after the past posts you have made. It makes you look desperate and completely Bias. If you hate chris (and who doesn’t) or you hate saki that’s your issue. Get your facts right before you make crazy claims about stuff you don’t know.

#74

As per Sakis post I was saying 93 can affect things. You’re correct in saying it seems backhanded. That was not my intention. Even if there is no “buffer” built in Justin you know as well as anyone octane, on a hot day, makes a difference. We’re talking about cushion difference. Or the ability to run back to back without needing to stop.

I was not discrediting the run, but the comparison made by saki and Chris.

My congratulations to JHM is the same, not half assed, a full congratulations the same one I sent to CV himself. I can’t control how you, nor anyone else interprets my words on the Internet.

No disrespect to JHM, my fight only seems to be with them because saki/Chris stick so close to JHM side it’s hard to come at saki/Chris without seeming to bash JHM.

That is not my intention, I congratulate them, and CV for the awesome time especially without a fueling upgrade.

Justin, my quarrel is also not with you. It’s with saki and Chris and their lies.

#75

I want to be honest. Im told great things about you. I don’t see them here or in some of your other posts. I don’t want to get in the middle. I don’t want to be part of this. I think you need to see the impact of what your looking to do vs the outcome.
You do realize that you made the claim that a “buffer” can be built even tho you have no idea if one was and then while 93 can help do we know if it did help on 91. No none of us do. what is the point of argument. So you can prove chris and saki wrong. It has created a mess.

#76

Well done JHM!

I’m guessing the title of “Worlds Fastest B7 RS4” is going to be changing hands again shortly. I’m sure AMD/Aviva and TTS would like it back, even if for a short time. :wink:

#77

I said this on Audizine. I think companys need to start taking more time to show there kits are safe then to worry about pushing the kits further to show there fast. At some point in time I want to see this isn’t like what companys have done with the B5 and they just keep pushing with no regard for how long or how safe this is for the cars.

#78

Tweets,

I think the whole “-800” thing came from the difference between AMD’s DA and JHM’s DA. Not that AMD had an actual DA of “-800”…

Saki correct me if I am looking at that wrong…

#79

Bottom line take home message that somehow seems to get lost is JHM is developing a potent kit that is producing results. That’s it, period.

People are smart enough to make their own informed decisions as to which route to take based on research and discussion with x,y, or z developer, and if they are not, well then lesson learned.

No amount of personal attacks and childish bickering serves to help either cause frankly. Its laughable actually.

#80

Congratulations on having the world’s fastest b7 rs4. If this thread was created to inform the world of this accomplishment, there should not have been a need for anyone to compare it to any other car( b8 s4, b5 s4).

Without the tune they would have never taken the car to the track.(well done Count Vaughan)

It is obvious that Tweets purpose was to create havoc, despite the fact that he clearly stated months ago that he would not post again on this forum until his car was up and running with results. It has been months and no results, but plenty comebacks and returns after disappearance. Tweets please stop acting(actor) a fool.

I would like to ask this since everyone is making comparisons:

  1. If the JHM driver drove the amd car, would the results have been the same?
  2. Out of all the company’s selling super charger kits for the b7 rs4, who has the better driver mod? And by how much?

JHM has the fastest b7 RS4 point blank, that is all that matters.
DA, tires, gas, what mods the cars had should not even be a factor in this thread.