I would like to add I said several times nobody serious takes a test that will get ur licence removed car impounded and huge fines is something most people are going to care about. .nice to see CV pop In with that.
No one argues this, but you just put it on the window and push the power button, then run a 1/4 mile and you get all the data you want. It’s that simple.
well if you can do 60-130 in under 6 seconds its not a big deal I could do it in front of my house
Actually…
I am no English major, but you have yet to show me a difference in the two quotes… (Let a lone, if I was an English major, I would tell you your country spells things wrong, especially the word checking)
H
There is so much irony in your post I will leave it as is, quoted for eternity.
People who have actually been on a plane or read a history book will realise how ridiculous you look.
You’re a smear/spin artist, a prime example of taking a quote out of context. The two quotes reference the same thing, Kurt commenting on how he thought the 605s with a 3L were a better match than the 770s and a 3L in the 1/4 mile. The first quote is a response to Kurt, second quote is what I was reiterating. But of course you try to belittle and yet to explain. Let alone the fact that I know Canada uses old English derived from England (for the most part). That sir, is a joke, I was messing with you. The real irony is you haven’t shown the two quotes difference, yet you responded thinking you had.
I think Kurt already spanked you for your inaccurate post. In a couple of threads actually. I’ll leave it at that.
I thoyght it was just me… let me help
tweets you say
[quote] Kurt commenting on how he thought the 605s with a 3L were a better match than the 770s and a 3L in the 1/4 mile
[/quote]
CV said.
I didn’t see anything on there about the 605s being better then the 770s I saw just what he said.
Tweets said
[quote] though count once told me the 605s on a 3.0 would be better than the 770s every dyno I see and street log spools the two tials at the same RPM essentially.
[/quote]
lets reamember what CV really said.
CV said
[quote]1. I never said 770s were better for the 3.0. I said the 605s are better for the 3.0 then the RS6r
[/quote]
CV actually toutched on the spooloing issues
CV said
[quote]It might not be bad for you to consider the ability of a Dyno by its design,( is meant to help the Turbos get going more so then you see on the street), simply using load. When your car is under Dyno load it can and by design is much different then on the street.
[/quote]
you tial guys are fucking rock stupid. None of the cars are fast and when you guys fail miserbully you go back and make yourself feel better looking at logs…how has that worked…oh it hasn’t…wonder why
seriously eveyone can make a joke about spelling and the fact I don’t care to correct my POS phone fat fingger mistakes. why would I take time to care if nono of you guys take time to read.
even I can see what CV is saying and its the same thing that every smart person can see. You guys want big dyno sheets and your pushing your power curve further up the RPM till its PEAK is bigger then its curve YET ANOTHER CV quote if you take time to read. Sure you can spend 100k on your car and make up for some of the issues in how the 770s or 605s work or you caou;d just go get a beter sized turbo
Im assuming this means what I think it means.
CV said.
kinda the same thing everyone has been saiding from day one.
Kurt said to me, on the phone, almost a year ago to the day (valentines day I was picking up flowers) that he thought the 3.0 + 605 was a better match for the 1/4 than a 3.0 with 770s, he ALSO said the RS6Rs were a 2.7 turbo and the 605 would be better on a 3.0L. This is not something I am pulling from the Internet. I forgive you guys, you can only know what you read/hear.
Both of you have proven 0 and are arguing over trivial things, per usual to display your “intelligence” and E-dominance. Way to listen and help the growth of a platform boys…
UGH 605s spool the same as 770s so a 3L 770r would be better at 1/4 then the 605 3L car
usually your not this far off.
you guys are seriously dum as door stops. the 605 and the 770 have very different components and those components effect the spool. This is why there are two different units and not just one.
so far no one has been able to back up the 770s and the 605s spool the same. In dyno and logs the two things that no one can repeat. Seiroyly there is a reason Tial guys and the B5 guys get laughted at.
tweets your rock stupid… sure the 770s and 605s spool the same… thats why they have two different turbos :
We have seen you guys cant read so this is directly from a tial vender that has tested them.
[quote]Tial engineered compressor wheels in both, the turbos offer completely reasonable levels of lag, typically coming on hard boost by 3300rpm and 4000rpm respectively
[/quote]
same spool…what a joke you guys. get your shit together. if the 3300 is the 605s then I would too say the 605s are better for 1/4 mile.
same spool…what a joke you guys. get your shit together. if the 3300 is the 605s then I would too say the 605s are better for 1/4 mile.
[/quote]
Yep, I have no idea what I’m talking about. Sorry for even trying to step into your arena of superior intellegence…
How about you go look at what I said. I said that after seeing the two turbos (in cars) they seem to spool almost identically. Which, if you look at logs on the street, they do. Look it up, BRAH!
Yep, I have no idea what I’m talking about. Sorry for even trying to step into your arena of superior intellegence…
How about you go look at what I said. I said that after seeing the two turbos (in cars) they seem to spool almost identically. Which, if you look at logs on the street, they do. Look it up, BRAH!
[/quote]
what he doesnt under stand is that the hot side AR is the same and the 770 which has a bigger wheels also i ball bearing thats why the spool almost identically! Saki is just always right and i honestly dont understand why he is always swinging off B5 guys nuts! Get back to the lame and boring b7 world
lets show you what rality looks like.
you say the spool is the saem BUT A COMPANY LOOKING TO ACTUALLY SELL THESE AND A COMPANY THAT TESTS THESE SAID THIS.
[quote]Tial engineered compressor wheels in both, the turbos offer completely reasonable levels of lag, typically coming on hard boost by 3300rpm and 4000rpm respectively
[/quote]
THAT WAS A QUOTE BY A VENDER>>>>SOMEONE THAT TESTS THEM…SELLLS THEM… IF the shool was the same they would love to use that…
ohhh ya thats the same only a 800rpm difference but basically the same : ::)… but wait logs… you have logs… logs…dyno sheets dyno sheets.
[quote]e
It might not be bad for you to consider the ability of a Dyno by its design,( is meant to help the Turbos get going more so then you see on the street), simply using load. When your car is under Dyno load it can and by design is much different then on the street.
[/quote]
wake up and smell the stupid its all over you… you guys act like im attacking you. Im not im looking to help you guys are so blinded by the utter lack of any results. when you cling on to results there wrong or don’t add up.
you want a fast tial car add e85 tiles suck so bad that if uyou add 40% more fule its makes up for it.
aLL I haer from you is how great they are… but the only great thing that has happened is a great failure…there is a 10 step program out there for you some where.
Being me some logs that prove me otherwise and I will tell you your correct.
Might as well not argue about 605’s. The old 605’s are gone, and the new 605v2 are basically Journal bearing 770’s.
Yep, how do mine look? Lol
I will let you know once their on my car. 
Reid, thanks for the 3.0/602.2’s. The A4 is going to be a beast.