Less talk more do…
That goes for everyone here, none of you have 60-130 times, because your to pussy to even try.
Audizine didn’t create the 60-130 Sakofballs, why don’t you hit up 6speedonline.com where cars that all of the folks on this site only dream of show off their 60-130 times.
Oh look another 60-130 vs 1/4 queen argument. This site fails at everything.
[/quote]
You make no sense… You said the 60-130 is universally accepted as the standard test.
That’s a crock of shit. Audizine, your home forum, doesnt even fucking agree with you.
If it did there would be more than half a dozen cars in the damn list.
Anyone ready for a laugh? As e know the AMD cars are tuned by EPL and both companies are TERRIFIED of the dragstrip.
Look who half the times are from in the 60-130 list… AMD/EPL cars lol.
Better still??? Look who the registered ‘subject matter experts’ are who will impartially evaluate and approve times for the list… Jason @ amd lol
http://i375.photobucket.com/albums/oo193/sakimano/export_09_zps29c48467.png
Audizine had nothing to do with 6speedonline independently verifying my time, or my 60-130 file.
Audizine is NOT my home forum, I don’t even have a build thread there anymore.
Next?
Are you retarded? I would submit that almost nobody on any forum has 60-130 times because
A) they don’t have a $500 pbox
B) they don’t fucking care about the 60-130…almost nobody does really, not even the b5s4 guys on AZ ironically.
For the record about twenty of us have 60-130 times for our cars here.
I guess you hate being proven wrong. In that case this site is certainly not going to be a comfortable place. Back to audizine where nobody cares about your 60-130 times and your busted car.
Find a dedicated platform car forum where the 60-130 is considered the standard performance measurement equal to or more important than the quarter mile. Because from where I sit they all use the quarter mile other than the dozen or so guys in 6speed. Even them, the 60-130 list is dying off because they all have awd turbos and gtrs and the 60-130 isn’t nearly as necessary for the traction challenged gt2 guys any more.
Actually 034 finally gave up on beating my 60-130 time. I have called everyone I can think of that has a fast B5 out, and they ALL FAILED.
3 years have gone by, no one, not a single B5 besides another AMD car has come close to my time. Why? Because no one is putting down that kind of power.
All I hear are excuses, anyone of you nutthuggers on here, go fucking do a 60-130 grow a pair of balls. You don’t, because you go do one, realize your in the 15second range, and then give up. Same thing everyone else does.
Hell even if your Audi is reasonably fast, you should be able to get into the 9sec range.
All I hear is cry cry cry, we don’t care about 60-130, blah blah blah. Cool, I don’t care about 1/4 so were even.
Funny, you might think I actually want to build a car to beat my bad 1/4 time, but no, I actually really want to beat my 60-130 time.
I have no problem coming on here and going at it with you guys, I actually find it fun.
Next?
So let see here,
None of you guys have a 2.0 FATS
None of you guys have a 60-130
None of you guys have a dyno showing crazy power.
None of you guys have trapped 128 +.
And yet you all think your king shit.
I guess when you are wrong, you just start hurling insults?
Here… This is literally the only place on earth that cares about the 60-130
6speedonline
Check your history books because it was these guys who started using it for their traction challenged Porsches.
http://m.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55163
Best part? They have about 100 more quarter mile times in the thread than they do 60-130
What do they put first? Quarter mile times.
So again, congrats on being fast at a benchmark that is virtually ignored in the performance car world, and is second to the quarter mile on the one site they care about 60-130.
P.s. My 60-130 time for my stock rs4 was 13.49 seconds on a flat road. At no point during the test did I find myself caring what the time would be. I also am pretty sure your car blew up trying to achieve your 60-130 time… Making your car a worthless pile of scrap in the process. What’s your time now? I. E. With you and Jason pushing the car?
Did your leader tell you to take a sh!t on this jhm thread?
Is your beast that you praise so much still in existence, or did it go down in history as another Amd flop? Because from the looks of things your leader has broken a few records of his own.
Also, please refrain from calling everyone on the site names please. I would appreciate it if you would direct your negative energy to particular individuals on this site that you have a problem with, unless you, yourself are too puss√ to address them directly.
Who the fuck is killers4 anyways?
Burningcoals
he is one more in the long line of faild b5 guys whos car * is broken by the way and dosen’t run* is so piss slow he gets laughed at and in a weak ass attempt to not look like a fool he is desperatly clinging on to his SELF PROCLAIMED impornant 60-130 time. A time that only he cares about and has continously tried to get people to care but more adults just laugh and say sure kid go hang out with some weak ass looser that has a shit shop a shit additude and has been accued of using nitrous on your car and start a test when the leagle speed limit in most states is already exceeded.
Killers4 is one in the long line of lists of people whos car is such an epic fail that he just cryes all the time and attacks any real level headed person that comes with facts.
hey killer news flash 034 and everyone else stopped trying to beat your 60-130 time the second it happened because no one cares
I think your claim that 60-130 is ignored in the performance car world is reaching a bit much don’t you?
AMD hit the power limit of my block, it developed low oil pressure at lower RPMS, and an investigation led us to find a crack. In a sense you can say we blew it up pushing power, in this case development of AMD new IM modification.
So amd blew your motor testing the limits of the platform? Always a good sign when a shop says 'hmm… Let’s try this ’ using customer cars.
Why don’t they buy their own car(s)? These things cost a pittance.
Anyway go back to audizine or Wayot where you’re loved if all you want to do is troll here. Good luck with your car… Whatever you end up doing. I’m sure you’ll be back in a amd built 770 car tuned by EPL because it was so good right? I mean who would boast so much to do something different? Surely not someone who was happy with their car.
exactly and isn’t this guys the same guy who has a rs4 euro 3rd gear… that is going to help the 60-130. when your the only one talking about how impressive your car is maybe its not that impressive.
I have a complete stock trans. Your talking about someone else.
I love it when you add to your posts, usually need to wait 5 minutes to make sure your done.
Seems a pretty negative post to me. Actually I would love to end up with my SAME exact setup, with a motor that will hold up better. It was an amazing TQ machine, it fell flat a bit soon, but was so fun to drive. I mean .8g in 4th gear is insane.
I have nothing but good memories of that setup, I miss it. The current plan is basically to source some new 770, probably work on top end a bit.
good enough I retract my statment. Sorry for the mix up.
Ill tell you what a very wise and very well respected friend of mine said.
60-130 is pointless. It was never inveted to do anything othern then to help rwd cars and porsche owners feel better that there cars don’t make traction and with not having traction they invented a test of tractionless cars. IF… IF your going to use a 60-130 time and want respect for it make sure its to back up an impressive 1/4 mile time. if you don’t have a impressive 1/4 mile time you better be able to show you can’t hold traction at 45mph. if not your just proving that you have nothing more then a over hyped dyno qeen…
your posts are just proving the dyno qeen point and when you show us you can’t get traction at 40mph then we will start to listen…till then…
Most of you know who made that quote he is on this site.
thanks