The m510 weighed 26, peelers 29
The picture above that saki posted of my car are the enkei I have
What about your tires, which ones? What does the combo weigh? 50-51ish?
Anyway saxon good work going to the strip.
We won’t dog you anymore lol.
M510 set up weighs 50lbs, the enkei set up weighs 41/42 lbs
Such a nice setting. I’m used to sac which is, well lets just say, not.
Way to man up and post the slip. Kudos.
Did you get a free tune for helping them out? Serious question, not trying to stir anything up. I would have asked…
No I paid for the tune, not the 1250 but the 1000 he had posted originally. There were no conditions of the discount fyi, but he knew I would actually hit the track
Good to see you hit the track Saxon!
Nice catch on the pulley though drob, the time surprised me at first.
Why did you switch from the SRM to the APR pulley? Maybe I misread your other posts, because I know for sure you got the srm removal tool…
Nice!
Stage 3 B5 that traps 106? Something wrong there.
Lol that’s standard b5 stuff. See earkier when he said he did pulls with a ‘400 whp’ b5 and I told him to find a new benchmark? They’re all over the map.
Did you see the nogaro b5 at cayuga on the 19th? Had everything but bigger turbos and ran 15s
All that info will be in my post, just waiting on a couple more things
Still curious why you are trying to discredit new GIAC revision that had problems with bypass and bleeding off boost in previous versions.
Implying they are altering or modifying knock sensitivity is something you made up yourself or Tony is having you imply? Because it is simply false.
Where were you and auditude Friday?
I have no agenda against giac, your post had nothing to do with epl, and I don’t have an agenda let alone do something someone else told me to.
I was working. I am sure pete was also. I invited you to a private track rental (atco) which has actually changed to May 20th. You coming??
Your agenda? Lol every other post you make on AZ requests to see logs and you are the only one implying some sort of modification to knock sensor sensitivity because “timing the only way to make power”. Just an FYI - Timing hasn’t changed much between the two revisions. What has changed is the tune behavior with regard to bypass.
You are making false assumptions. Edit … I mean Tony is.
Lol, trust me, I only follow my own “agenda”
I’ve only talked to Tony about my tune and nothing more.
Of course I want to see logs, I want to make sure my tune is aggressive and on par with others, can you blame me?
Nope don’t blame you. I will have some new apr stage 2 and giac stage logs for u when I can get everyone together again. Haven’t done a comparison in a while since giac was having the bypass issue that they now fixed.
So lets recap on how EPL hasn’t had a tune for the past year even thou they say they have and lets see how saxton is the test dummy
With all this help for the comunity he has posted no logs… No dyno sheet and tony has been a failure on the tune. This tune has been out for over a year now and saxton needed 4 revisions… his track performance sucks and is more like a stage 1 car and for some reason he keeps telling EPL… who is suposed to know what they are doing that he needs them to add more boost.
I sum this up like this. Most of this is saxon getting a free tune… I don’t see anyone dumb enough to pay 1000$ and then have to help the tuneer make the tune. 4 revisions and how many lies.
Saxton already said in April that he was happy with the tune but then just days ago
[quote]May 3rd
Actually have the apr pulley on it now
Once I’m happy with the 93 tune, the plan is an e85 tune
[/quote]
happy with the tune… you alreday said you were happy with the tune months ago…has the tune gotten worse… Your the one basically making the tune here… Its clear this tune was never done and who knows how safe it isn’t. You keep saying how great tony is but… you paid him … suposidly… 1000$ and the tune sucked and your now on your 4th revision…and he is great…what was he suposed to do spit in your face…You bought something that didn’t work…if you even paid…and your the only one with the tune trying to make the tune work…its laughable…
No wonder TSIVAS27 said this.
[quote]Your agenda? Lol every other post you make on AZ requests to see logs and you are the only one implying some sort of modification to knock sensor sensitivity because “timing the only way to make power”. Just an FYI - Timing hasn’t changed much between the two revisions. What has changed is the tune behavior with regard to bypass.
You are making false assumptions. Edit … I mean Tony is.
[/quote]
First of all its saxon, 
I’ve had one revision, and since then changed pullies
I’m running just as fast as some 100oct apr cars and for the 2nd time at the track with less than 10 runs I’m more than happy with a 12.3 @ 15.5 lbs