I think he’s insinuating a lawsuit.
He has 10s of… 1s… of people with the same issue. JHM blew up our motors!!!
http://audirevolution.net/forum/index.php?topic=1839.0
I will just have to add the other non jhm tuned motor issues I found to the list I guess.
Lawsuit LOL he will spend more trying to get nothing out of JHM than he would just getting a new motor. Its a performance part and it says right on JHMs website they are not responsible for any issues related to performance parts.
the dummy doesn’t even know the B8 S4 is DSG only, no 8 speed automatic.
[/quote]
I made reference 4 times across various forums that the 3.0T paired with either a 6 speed manual , 7 speed DSG or 8 speed Automatic will see a benefit running a Fluidampr.
Given someone of your background , I would have thought you understood that but instead you wanted to focus on
“Oh the B8 S4 never came with an 8 speed gearbox so you must know what you are talking about…blah blah blah”
Your rebuttal as petty and that is reason the forum jumped on you. Had nothing to do with the way you speak to people behind a keyboard but simply with what you blindly posted. You showed everyone that you lack evidence or even understanding of the product. The claim I made was based on past experience with DSG gearboxes + Dual Mass flywheels and users going from rubber/billet aluminum dampers to Fluidamprs.
But then again , you can continue with your insults or wait for the results. People started getting Fluidampr’s this morning so it won’t be too long now before my claims are tested whether true or false.
I made reference 4 times across various forums that the 3.0T paired with either a 6 speed manual , 7 speed DSG or 8 speed Automatic will see a beit running a Fluidampr.
Given someone of your background , I would have thought you understood that but instead you wanted to focus on
“Oh the B8 S4 never came with an 8 speed gearbox so you must know what you are talking about…blah blah blah”
Your rebuttal as petty and that is reason the forum jumped on you. Had nothing to do with the way you speak to people behind a keyboard but simply with what you blindly posted. You showed everyone that you lack evidence or even understanding of the product. The claim I made was based on past experience with DSG gearboxes + Dual Mass flywheels and users going from rubber/billet aluminum dampers to Fluidamprs.
But then again , you can continue with your insults or wait for the results. People started getting Fluidampr’s this morning so it won’t be too long now before my claims are tested whether true or false.
[/quote]
INA is this fluidampr something you sell or make. From your post it implied that you possibly make this product
Just to clairify. Im not jumping to any colclusions here. I just remembered somewhere you or someone saying you were making parts or thinking about making parts for the B8 S4. I was just wondering when those would be comming out and whats in the works. The B8 S4 seems to be in a good pattern of growth its interesting to see whats in the pipe line
the dummy doesn’t even know the B8 S4 is DSG only, no 8 speed automatic.
[/quote]
I made reference 4 times across various forums that the 3.0T paired with either a 6 speed manual , 7 speed DSG or 8 speed Automatic will see a benefit running a Fluidampr.
Given someone of your background , I would have thought you understood that but instead you wanted to focus on
“Oh the B8 S4 never came with an 8 speed gearbox so you must know what you are talking about…blah blah blah”
Your rebuttal as petty and that is reason the forum jumped on you. Had nothing to do with the way you speak to people behind a keyboard but simply with what you blindly posted. You showed everyone that you lack evidence or even understanding of the product. The claim I made was based on past experience with DSG gearboxes + Dual Mass flywheels and users going from rubber/billet aluminum dampers to Fluidamprs.
But then again , you can continue with your insults or wait for the results. People started getting Fluidampr’s this morning so it won’t be too long now before my claims are tested whether true or false.
With respect to the 2.7TT and 3.0 SC motor , we partnered up with Fluidampr to manufacture the dampers to our
specifications using our Engineering data , input and design characteristics. This has been a 12+ month process and the only reason it ended up on Audizine was due to someone letting the cat out of the bag.
As stated on AZ , once the 2.7TT project is closed (Wednesday) then the 3.0 Supercharged project will be finalized.
I made reference 4 times across various forums that the 3.0T paired with either a 6 speed manual , 7 speed DSG or 8 speed Automatic will see a beit running a Fluidampr.
Given someone of your background , I would have thought you understood that but instead you wanted to focus on
“Oh the B8 S4 never came with an 8 speed gearbox so you must know what you are talking about…blah blah blah”
Your rebuttal as petty and that is reason the forum jumped on you. Had nothing to do with the way you speak to people behind a keyboard but simply with what you blindly posted. You showed everyone that you lack evidence or even understanding of the product. The claim I made was based on past experience with DSG gearboxes + Dual Mass flywheels and users going from rubber/billet aluminum dampers to Fluidamprs.
But then again , you can continue with your insults or wait for the results. People started getting Fluidampr’s this morning so it won’t be too long now before my claims are tested whether true or false.
[/quote]
INA is this fluidampr something you sell or make. From your post it implied that you possibly make this product
Just to clairify. Im not jumping to any colclusions here. I just remembered somewhere you or someone saying you were making parts or thinking about making parts for the B8 S4. I was just wondering when those would be comming out and whats in the works. The B8 S4 seems to be in a good pattern of growth its interesting to see whats in the pipe line
[/quote]
Seems to me that even if it comes to light to him that JHM tune did not cause directly his catastrophic engine failure, he’s too deep in now and will never admit it. He’ll be a laughing stock of an entire forum.
With respect to the 2.7TT and 3.0 SC motor , we partnered up with Fluidampr to manufacture the dampers to our
specifications using our Engineering data , input and design characteristics. This has been a 12+ month process and the only reason it ended up on Audizine was due to someone letting the cat out of the bag.
As stated on AZ , once the 2.7TT project is closed (Wednesday) then the 3.0 Supercharged project will be finalized.
Thread will be locked shortly as op is not a one you could have an intellectual adult like conversation. He’s already name calling others for no good reason and ignoring a bunch of posts with valid questions from multiple members. Besides posting some obvious bs and his shitty attitude, this won’t go on for long. Jumping a gun is an understatement of the year here.
I can’t read your quote above but let’s be clear
FIRST I said you were ridiculous for claiming that a fucking dampened crank pulley will gain someone 20-25 whp vs a solid crank pulley. You did it with a straight face…and you based it on some bullshit dyno data from one VW. the other ‘proof’ you showed a guy who gained 4 whp I believe… In other words the error allowance of a dynomometer.
THEN I pointed out you’re incompetent for posting that the B8 S4 has an 8 speed automatic. It shows your complete lack of understanding of the platform. You’re holding yourself out to be an expert who can build precision parts for the crank of a $15,000 engine in a $60,000 car yet you haven’t even done your homework on what transmission it has yet. This shows your crank pulley is vapourware.
You posted a couple of dynos showing who knows what mods dynod by who knows who. I responded to the dyno assertions with a link to a YouTube video showing that dyno claims are basically bullshit and can be manipulated very easily by the user. You really think dampening vs non dampening is gaining someone 20-25 whp because that’s what showed up on a dyno once ? You’re insane. And you claim to be a fucking engineer??? Go re-read your scientific method texts from high school.
[/quote]
Seems to me that even if it comes to light to him that JHM tune did not cause directly his catastrophic engine failure, he’s too deep in now and will never admit it. He’ll be a laughing stock of an entire forum.
We talked about that thread above. Have a look.
I want him to answer
-
Why the tune caused misfires now, but didn’t for 1 year and 20,000 miles. This is pretty odd. Did the parameters change in the past week?
-
Why the tune caused pinging or detonation now, but didn’t for 1 year and 20,000 miles. This too is odd. Did the parameters change in the past week?
-
Why the tune didn’t cause these problems on every single jhm tuned car.
The variable thay is obvious is the rest of the car the tune is on. Now you could maybe argue that the tune isn’t safe enough. Ok, however the tune yelled at him in the form of a flashing CEL for misfires. Protection.
Did he Park it? Nope. He kept driving. Can the tune protect the car against a failed injector if you keep driving? To a certain extent it can but it can’t prevent you from being stupid.
His correction? Coil plugs and spark plugs. Why? Did jhm advise him to do this and that driving the car would be OK? If so sure he may have a case for poor diagnostic advice. However I am sure any jhm email would have a thorough disclaimer at the bottom protecting them.
If anyone is interested though please ask him those 3 questions. I think kkolade asked one of them (why isn’t everyone having this problem if the variable is the tune rather than hardware).
Thread will be locked shortly as op is not a one you could have an intellectual adult like conversation. He’s already name calling others for no good reason and ignoring a bunch of posts with valid questions from multiple members. Besides posting some obvious bs and his shitty attitude, this won’t go on for long. Jumping a gun is an understatement of the year here.
Oh, wow…he drove it for a year before this happened, lol! Sorry, I didn’t even read his first post, I saw the title and 4 pages of stupid so I had to respond. I feel like arguing today, so hopefully he pops back in that thread to entertain me.
You were given 2 extremes.
Bone stock Audi A3 1.8 TSI DSG with 0 modifications
Extreme modified VW R32 with 3.2 (Turbocharged) and DSG.
I can provide you with more if you want or you can continue denying that the product works.
YES.
Finally you are catching on.
I wouldn’t call 100’s of times across various forums “once” . This “vapourware” actually works and has worked long before you owned an RS4.
Not an insane as someone who refuses to believe the data infront of them.
Ask yourself one question.
What is going to happen when people start posting before and after dyno’s after? You going to call them out too just because your head is so far up a certain companies ass or will you finally succumb to the fact that you really don’t know what you are talking about with respect to torsional vibration dampers?
“you don’t know the platform”
Oh fuck off…
When I was the APR distributor for Ottawa I was the only APR distributor that performed all the supercharger pulley swaps from Toronto to Laval as the dealer in Guelph was “closed”.
When you keep repeating this statement it makes you sound so petty. You knew full well I was referring to the Audi A7 paired with an 8-speed transmission. But keep up with the petty insults and continue repeating it…it makes you sound so cool (for now).
I am out. See you on Audizine.
I think the problem is your definition of ‘works’ or ‘data’ is a dyno and mine is acceleration. We are buying parts for acceleration. You’re selling dyno sheets.
I can show you how to make tire pressure adjustments that will show your customers their car made ‘gains’ but when they try to accelerate, they won’t be any faster than before. Or should I say the customers of the companies whose products you drop ship.
I also think it’s funny that you really think you’re going to see a 7% power increase on a pretty maxed out stage 2 B8 S4 by changing a billet aluminium crank pulley out for one that is EXACTLY the same diameter (so no supercharger RPM change) but that has ‘fluidampr’ special sauce rubber. I think it’s incredible that the dummies on audizine believed you to be honest. I thought the B8 section was smarter.
Now you’re saying that when you said ‘the B8 S4 with DSG or 8 speed automatic…’ you actually meant the A7? lolol keep digging.
You’re the biggest snake oil salesman I’ve seen in a looong time on forums.
I can’t read your quote above but let’s be clear
FIRST I said you were ridiculous for claiming that a fucking dampened crank pulley will gain someone 20-25 whp vs a solid crank pulley. You did it with a straight face…and you based it on some bullshit dyno data from one VW. the other ‘proof’ you showed a guy who gained 4 whp I believe… In other words the error allowance of a dynomometer.
THEN I pointed out you’re incompetent for posting that the B8 S4 has an 8 speed automatic. It shows your complete lack of understanding of the platform. You’re holding yourself out to be an expert who can build precision parts for the crank of a $15,000 engine in a $60,000 car yet you haven’t even done your homework on what transmission it has yet. This shows your crank pulley is vapourware.
You posted a couple of dynos showing who knows what mods dynod by who knows who. I responded to the dyno assertions with a link to a YouTube video showing that dyno claims are basically bullshit and can be manipulated very easily by the user. You really think dampening vs non dampening is gaining someone 20-25 whp because that’s what showed up on a dyno once ? You’re insane. And you claim to be a fucking engineer??? Go re-read your scientific method texts from high school.