lol I always contact the B5 guys when I want advice on naturally aspirated V8 performance.
What a tit. Although he did eat a shitburger when Drew posted some info for him.
Would be funny to watch him race his 600 hp Tial B5 against a JHM tuned B6 from a dig to 100 MPH with both cars on pump gas. Wonder what would happen.
How do I get the fart back??? lulz
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/538669-Help!-DSG-Fart-is-GONE!!!
the DSG fart scared me when I test drove a DSG B8 3 years ago. It felt like something fell over in the trunk.
On another note, there have literally been dozens of people on the forums with mechatronics failures. WTF
^^ ya that doesn’t inspire confidence. 2010 was the first year they used this version of the DSG - but I do not recall whether the mech failures are limited only to that model year. sounds like a costly maintenance for td1 guys.
Another guy with a JHM tune…
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/538849-JHM-Tune-report
I’m not sure what is up with all the new guys bitching, but maybe they should stick with their damn 95 Integras instead of Audi S4s that are AWD V8s!
[quote]The tune would be just fine for a race car where the lower gears aren’t used very often or you don’t need to be smooth in the lower gears while working the clutch. That’s not why I bought the car. I’m not a tweenager (anymore) that’s willing to sacrifice easy drivability for a few more horsepower and the extra thrill. The car needs to be easy to drive in lower gears. The quality of the JHM tune is lacking in that area and doesn’t effectively produce a product that represents what this customer wants.
[/quote]
Then get a damn A4…fuck
Dear JHM, can you please revise your tune and make it less powerful…or better yet, add a few versions in the octane drop down menu for the tune on your website…
93 for racecars
91 for racecars in CA
93 for MEN
91 for MEN
93 for pussies
91 for pussies
Anyone notice Arin’s amd 0.9 vs Apr graph… And the reaction from the amd guys?
Basically the graph showed the opposite of what the amd guys were all claiming… Which is that the 1900 would dominate low end torque wise over the 1320
Low and behold on a pnw dynojet run on a stock + Apr car on 92 vs the recent dynojet of the amd 0.9 car on 92 with Catless aftermarket downpipes, the Apr tvsr1320 dominated till about 7000, and the amd kit took over from 7300 to redline (not a huge difference though.
Anyway the amd guys are thanking Arin for posting the information and saying things like “that was big of you”, as if the information is bad for Apr lol
Hmm… Better area under the curve for 90 % of the dyno range for Apr vs the 45% larger blower on the amd kit, and Apr did so with four catalytic converters with 2.5-2.36" dowbpipes vs zero cats on 3" pipes for amd
…and they thinks it’s bad for Apr? Lolololol
I also say Aussiefag pointing out the stock fueling limits based off the graphs…??? How is he assuming that?
[quote]Thanks again to Arin for posting up the comparison, which shows pretty clearly that both kits are at or near the peak capacity of the stock fueling.
[/quote]
There is no way for him to see that…wtf?
that’s classic. People just repeat what they’re told.
They are way to dense to realize this…they just argue and like you said, repeat shit they heard someone else say. I’m not sure why half of them even care, they don’t do anything performance related with their cars.
[QUOTE=jibberjive;8723579]That sucks to hear, but I wish you luck with the next car. Post your updates here as well, as the AR elitists apparently couldn’t handle me and banned me with with their sham of a karma system. So I’m IP blocked from viewing their forum lol. Anyways, this was like the one thing from their B5 forum that I was interested in hear the conclusion of (and maybe the one thing over there that isn’t just reposting links from other, actually active and productive forums), so post here as well if you would.
Who bought the car?
[/quote]
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8723579
I needed a laugh today so I went into the A/S/RS5 section on Audizine and found a thread started by DinB as expected.
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/539713-Let-me-tell-you-what-RS-means
This post was pretty good.
[QUOTE=AvantQuattro;8722598]Reading a DinB thread makes me picture shit like this:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/272853/gary-busey-o.gif
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/136276/gayr-busey-crazy-o.gif
[/quote]
hahaha His OP was this…
[quote=DinB]A lot of people come on here saying why isn’t the RS5 Audi’s ultimate performer. However, that is not what the RS badge is about. In actuality, RS represents the factory tuned sports version of the car for those that want the best performance e in the model range without voiding the warranty or tuning the car. Nobody ever said that an S model or even an A model can’t be sportier. However, from the factory, that is never the case until you start investing in tuning.
[/quote]
and then the first reply was …
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8723579
[/quote]
Idiot…he hates it here…doesn’t he remember.
Jibberjivin’ for life… this is how I picture it if jibberjivin’ was a dance…
http://medias.omgif.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tibalibalou.gif
^ ROFLMAO!!! I put that with his quote since he cant see it here, thanks Euro!!
Forge Performance screws a GTR owner out of $250,000
http://www.gtrlife.com/forums/topic/85083-forged-performance-the-truth/
Wow that is a catalogue of errors. I feel for the guy. So much trust and money.
edit: a link from that thread - http://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/483103-forged-performance-my-story.html
Different car, same shit. Forums FTW.
Why do people do this shit to cars like RS4s? It is fucking gay and ruins another rare car!
http://i.imgur.com/y73h0Z9.jpg
Reminds me of these cartoon cars…
Those wheels are fucking gay.
I believe that’s his track setup
http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/540558-Autocross-pictures-from-last-summer?p=8737254