killerS4 glad to have you. I and I think everyone agrees with what you said and is happy to have someone clear a few things up.
The only thing I dissagree with is.
AMD is attempting to sell on AZ but they got kicked off for not paying to advertise. So they tred light.
And the biggest is.
[quote]There is no lieing or deceaving or fooling from AMD, all they do is build a car and the customer does the rest, if they somehow get all their customers to fool everybody then so be it. But when my car runs out and pulls a 2.0 FATS and a 5.7 60-130 using my own computer and laptop, I am generally satifified with the dyno numbers they are pulling.
[/quote]
This seems to be all AMD can do is offer steady dose of bull shit and insults. There reputation is just about as far down as you can get with credibilty. They have been cought several times doing shady or dishonest stuff when posting information… SO by extendsion of that no one believes them of what they say.
As for the Tials thats what this post is about. The fact that we don’t think tials are good is more because people like A(another)M(Minipulated)D(data or dyno) log have no idea what the turbos can do and there pooerly represnted
I want to say there that I doubt there is one member here that dosn’t want to see all the Audi guys do well Tial or other wise.
Just seems to me every time there is a Tial car there is a long list of excuses that come with it. You have 6 or 7 cars and they have all done great on a dyno and not been able to back that up on 1/4 mile times.
IF the cars excell in 60-120 times they should be smart enough to just say that there are more geared for that.
but you have to know what your talking about first to have that happen and it seems no on really knows whats going on and the only facts we have don;t look good