I wonder if I am on the latest maps as well…
If you haven’t been flashed in last week- then no. This is new flash based on recent cold weather testing.
Definitely not. Time for an update…
Good to see GIAC addressing this issue… Really, it’s about time…
Just cut a 10.15 and 10.2
Going back out brb.
Wow… You logging these? Send them my way please… Any bypass? Timing?
So are you saying giac has an updated flash now to fix the problems you had with bleeding boost?
No
Just cut a 9.9!!!
DBN or ban.
Looks decline of only 1.49 feet over entire run. So a little help.
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/12/07/a5abavah.jpg
It was actually 9.88s! Nice job. Having a decline def helps. 
Overall 60-130 decline was 0.34% or 4.877 ft drop over 1454.83 ft distance to do it.
Further analysis… Where most time is being shed…
104-124 decline was 0.65% or 3.792 ft drop over 587.96 ft distance covered.
104-130 decline was 0.48% decline or 4.005 ft drop over 825.48 ft distance covered.
60-90 3.11s
60-100 4.52s
60-110 6.02s
60-120 7.70s
60-130 9.88s
Want to add me to list 
-2497 DA!
wish we could… we don’t utilize decline like that though so it wouldn’t be good comparison. To keep integrity of list going… we only utilize our track data.
Whoops,
I was reading meters.
My logs in opposite direction are 10.15 and 10.2
Can you use a disadvantage of an incline then?
Clearly no advantage there.
Wasn’t done on our test track… I will get about 15 people wanting to add their times to list. Sweet time but I want to keep consistency with one strip being used. We have a stage 2 B8.5 GIAC car that will run soon with similar setup.
Post the other side run also to the shared link… Like to see what elevation changes there were there also.
Never hurts to ask
I totally understand and agree with your methodology.
Driving home from shop now, I will post all with proper titles.
LOL u just ignited fire under pete’s ass though… he is coming to pick up vbox.
Nice job on times.