zcd …lots of swearing, shouting, all caps, bold. Are you ok? Maybe you should step away from the keyboard?
you’re often feeling ‘attacked’ or ‘belittled’…maybe seek some help with that persecution complex. You don’t seem to be able to cope very well. These are pretty dramatic words for a golf thread on a car forum. I think there’s something wrong with your ability to understand context.
This discussion started off with me making a comment that spieth’s 64 looked pretty sloppy, and that he had loads of loose shots, and you’ve tried to cliche your way into an argument. Seriously, go read the start of this conversation.
Similar to the Bay Hill discussion where you did the same thing…picked an argument out of thin air. Then got owned as usual. Same in the thread where you were being an Audi fanboy and anti BMW people. In fact I don’t know why you quoted that…I had pointed out your foolish statement that a BMW 335 owner was worried about being embarrassed by an Audi S4. Reality couldn’t be further from the truth, but your concept of reality is so distorted that you don’t see it, and turn it into a big thing.
…same when you used to whine about your Stasis tune. It’s a broken record man.
Here’s the full BMW conversation. It’s clear you’re very insecure. Probably why you are projecting insecurity on the 335 owner.
Funny, ‘it happened exactly like I described’. In your head. You’re acting like you can read the guy’s mind. Maybe he wanted to run against a different car that didn’t have a loud exhaust? Maybe he was tired of running the same car? Maybe he was waiting for his buddy behind you? Nope, not in your head. In your head, he’s an insecure pussy who is ‘scared’ of a mid 12s Audi lolol. Maybe because if you lost you would do that? I can’t think of ever seeing someone ‘scared’ of a barely faster car at the strip, and I’ve been there 15 times and watched thousands of passes.
after more ranting by zcd, he disappeared…then necrobumped that thread a year later with the quote he posted above lol.
[quote=“sakimano,post:839,topic:4389”]
You should be asking yourself the same question, pal.
The stat that speaks loudest of all on that point is that you’re one who got himself suspended/banned from other forums multiple times, relegating you to this tiny little corner of the web…
zcd …lots of swearing, shouting, all caps, bold. Are you ok? Maybe you should step away from the keyboard?
you’re often feeling ‘attacked’ or ‘belittled’…maybe seek some help with that persecution complex. You don’t seem to be able to cope very well. These are pretty dramatic words for a golf thread on a car forum. I think there’s something wrong with your ability to understand context.
This discussion started off with me making a comment that spieth’s 64 looked pretty sloppy, and that he had loads of loose shots, and you’ve tried to cliche your way into an argument. Seriously, go read the start of this conversation.
Similar to the Bay Hill discussion where you did the same thing…picked an argument out of thin air. Then got owned as usual. Same in the thread where you were being an Audi fanboy and anti BMW people. In fact I don’t know why you quoted that…I had pointed out your foolish statement that a BMW 335 owner was worried about being embarrassed by an Audi S4. Reality couldn’t be further from the truth, but your concept of reality is so distorted that you don’t see it, and turn it into a big thing.
…same when you used to whine about your Stasis tune. It’s a broken record man.
Here’s the full BMW conversation. It’s clear you’re very insecure. Probably why you are projecting insecurity on the 335 owner.
Funny, ‘it happened exactly like I described’. In your head. You’re acting like you can read the guy’s mind. Maybe he wanted to run against a different car that didn’t have a loud exhaust? Maybe he was tired of running the same car? Maybe he was waiting for his buddy behind you? Nope, not in your head. In your head, he’s an insecure pussy who is ‘scared’ of a mid 12s Audi lolol. Maybe because if you lost you would do that? I can’t think of ever seeing someone ‘scared’ of a barely faster car at the strip, and I’ve been there 15 times and watched thousands of passes.
after more ranting by zcd, he disappeared…then necrobumped that thread a year later with the quote he posted above lol.
[quote=“sakimano”]
You should be asking yourself the same question, pal.
The stat that speaks loudest of all on that point is that you’re one who got himself suspended/banned from other forums multiple times, relegating you to this tiny little corner of the web…
calling out companies (forum sponsors) for lying. AKA APR denying JHM tuned their supercharged RS4 on AZ, and PES lying to customers about their SC kits for the S5/RS5. I was later shown to be correct by APR employees themselves, and just a couple of weeks ago, the new owner of A5oc posted that they had banned PES for exactly what I posted about.
calling out a moderator (audiworld) for lying and plagiarizing an article and presenting it as his own. I cross posted that here, and it destroyed his credibility because I was right. Site ownership sided with their buddy, and that’s fine. It’s all on the record.
If those things are bad and worthy of holding over my head, that’s fine. I think they’re all excellent reasons, and I’d do it again. It’s the internet.
So ironic that you would refer to “acting like you can read other people’s minds”, since that’s a key part of your M. O.
Commenting on a thread isn’t the same as seeking out arguments. You don’t like me mentioning that a golf course is rated as tougher by the USGA than one you played? Tough - what I posted was the truth (not my opinion), and as you wrote: “It’s the internet”.
calling out companies (forum sponsors) for lying. AKA APR denying JHM tuned their supercharged RS4 on AZ, and PES lying to customers about their SC kits for the S5/RS5. I was later shown to be correct by APR employees themselves, and just a couple of weeks ago, the new owner of A5oc posted that they had banned PES for exactly what I posted about.
calling out a moderator (audiworld) for lying and plagiarizing an article and presenting it as his own. I cross posted that here, and it destroyed his credibility because I was right. Site ownership sided with their buddy, and that’s fine. It’s all on the record.
If those things are bad and worthy of holding over my head, that’s fine. I think they’re all excellent reasons, and I’d do it again. It’s the internet.
the only golf course toughness discussion was because you were dogging Adam Scott for playing poorly at Bay Hill last year. I have played it tournament week, and I said to go easy on Adam Scott as Bay Hill from the tees they play is a nightmare tournament week. It wasn’t because u gave a shit that you said your course is tougher. It’s because you said something dumb. Go read it.
Bay Hill is one of 4 golf course I’ve played from tournament tees the week of a TOUR event. PGA National, Bay Hill, Hamilton Golf Club and Glen Abbey are the others.
You turned that into ‘my home course is harder than Bay Hill and our greens run 12.0-12.5 all day every day’. Those two statements within that sentence are retarded as Bay Hill from tournament tees with tournament conditions is nothing like your home course (for this you called me captain obvious, even though you’re the moron who just said your course is considerably tougher than Bay Hill lol), and then the green speed thing…well you know how that ended up. You had to eat a big shitburger but managed to not apologize for being completely wrong, acting like an ass, and telling me to ‘Shut The Fuck Up’ when you didn’t realise you were wrong and I was right.
You’re cancer. Just go back to shooting 95 at the toughest course on earth.
So ironic that you would refer to “acting like you can read other people’s minds”, since that’s a key part of your M. O.
Commenting on a thread isn’t the same as seeking out arguments. You don’t like me mentioning that a golf course is rated as tougher by the USGA than one you played? Tough - what I posted was the truth (not my opinion), and as you wrote: “It’s the internet”.
the only golf course toughness discussion was because you were dogging Adam Scott for playing poorly at Bay Hill last year. I have played it tournament week, and I said to go easy on Adam Scott as Bay Hill from the tees they play is a nightmare tournament week. It wasn’t because u gave a shit that you said your course is tougher. It’s because you said something dumb. Go read it.
Bay Hill is one of 4 golf course I’ve played from tournament tees the week of a TOUR event. PGA National, Bay Hill, Hamilton Golf Club and Glen Abbey are the others.
You turned that into ‘my home course is harder than Bay Hill and our greens run 12.0-12.5 all day every day’. Those two statements within that sentence are retarded as Bay Hill from tournament tees with tournament conditions is nothing like your home course (for this you called me captain obvious, even though you’re the moron who just said your course is considerably tougher than Bay Hill lol), and then the green speed thing…well you know how that ended up. You had to eat a big shitburger but managed to not apologize for being completely wrong, acting like an ass, and telling me to ‘Shut The Fuck Up’ when you didn’t realise you were wrong and I was right.
You’re cancer. Just go back to shooting 95 at the toughest course on earth.
[quote=“sakimano,post:847,topic:4389”]
Please don’t misquote/misrepresent the truth.
I said that Adam Scott hadn’t putted well, and you agreed that he was having issues.
The post you’re referencing is here. I didn’t compare my course conditions to Bay Hill tournament conditions, I compared rating and slope. In the end, the main point of my post was this:
“To me, it seems like the Bogey Rating should be listed on scorecards in addition to the other info, because it’s clear and easy to understand. Slope, by contrast, seems to be misunderstood by many (even most) golfers…”
Those are the last sentences of the post, but you ignored them completely, apparently having had your head explode when I pointed out that there are courses that are rated tougher than Bay Hill:
[quote=“sakimano”]
Please don’t misquote/misrepresent the truth.
I said that Adam Scott hadn’t putted well, and you agreed that he was having issues.
The post you’re referencing is here. I didn’t compare my course conditions to Bay Hill tournament conditions, I compared rating and slope. In the end, the main point of my post was this:
“To me, it seems like the Bogey Rating should be listed on scorecards in addition to the other info, because it’s clear and easy to understand. Slope, by contrast, seems to be misunderstood by many (even most) golfers…”
Those are the last sentences of the post, but you ignored them completely, apparently having had your head explode when I pointed out that there are courses that are rated tougher than Bay Hill:
Lol you’re kidding. Are you lost? You were dogging Adam Scott and I just said Bay Hill is balls tough from those tees they play and that you should give him a break. I was clearly talking about Bay Hill in tournament conditions since we were talking about Adam Scott.
Then you went on about your course and how tough it is, and your greens run 12.5 lololol. Then when I corrected you about that you went nuts.
Re: Re: Re: Golf Thread
« Reply #263 on: March 24, 2014, 06:34:30 PM »
[b]The hole before he tried to putt from 30 feet off the green and left it 22 feet short. And before that he 3 putted badly from a few feet off. He must have chip yips or something.
He’s awful. I don’t like him because I don’t like his asshole caddie.
P.S. I will be playing Bay Hill soon…course is impossible from those tees.[/b]
You don’t like Scott “because (of) his asshole caddie.” Nice logic there…
For the self-appointed “king of inconvenient truths”, you sure post a lot of stuff that’s “spun” to fit your vision of the truth.
You can keep trying to spin this into something it isn’t/wasn’t, and I’ll inconveniently keep pointing out the actual truth…
Lol you’re kidding. Are you lost? You were dogging Adam Scott and I just said Bay Hill is balls tough from those tees they play and that you should give him a break. I was clearly talking about Bay Hill in tournament conditions since we were talking about Adam Scott.
Then you went on about your course and how tough it is, and your greens run 12.5 lololol. Then when I corrected you about that you went nuts.
Re: Re: Re: Golf Thread
« Reply #263 on: March 24, 2014, 06:34:30 PM »
[b]The hole before he tried to putt from 30 feet off the green and left it 22 feet short. And before that he 3 putted badly from a few feet off. He must have chip yips or something.
He’s awful. I don’t like him because I don’t like his asshole caddie.
P.S. I will be playing Bay Hill soon…course is impossible from those tees.[/b]
You don’t like Scott “because (of) his asshole caddie.” Nice logic there…
For the self-appointed “king of inconvenient truths”, you sure post a lot of stuff that’s “spun” to fit your vision of the truth.
You can keep trying to spin this into something it isn’t/wasn’t, and I’ll inconveniently keep pointing out the actual truth…